
Re: A Point on Understanding
Posted:
Dec 27, 2012 6:37 PM



On Dec 27, 2012, at 6:24 PM, kirby urner <kirby.urner@gmail.com> wrote:
> The limit (360  v) really could be 0 if perfect flatness is allowed, > but when we add the constraint of curvature, then even though > everything locally seems to stay the same  given the epsilon / delta > treatment alone (Debater A)  the added fact of curvature is new > information and tells us that as n > infinity, there's a 720 > involved (Debater B).
1. You don't have to allow flatness. The limit(360v) is indeed 0. It is a limit. The function doesn't have to actually get there. 2. The limit(n*(360v)) is indeed 720, and again, allowing flatness is not an issue. 3. Now state your contradiction.
Bob Hansen

