george
Posts:
800
Registered:
8/5/08
|
|
Re: UNCOUNTABILITY
Posted:
Dec 19, 2012 11:52 PM
|
|
On Dec 19, 4:11 pm, Zuhair <zaljo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So having parameters in the defining formulas provides the grounds for
> POSSIBILITY of having uncountably many sets definable after them. But
> what PROVES the existence of uncountabily many parameter definable
> reals is of course the diagonal argument of Cantor.
Surely you must realize by now that attacking the diagonal argument
(actually the direct construction of the ANTI-diagonal of a PRESUMED
omegaXomega square) is THE #1 FAVORITE crank pastime around here.
By posting this you are just inviting every crank from WM on down
to do battle with you. You are new enough that this my seem
worthwhile
to you, BUT IT ISN'T. I'm not saying that JUST because I'm burnt out
after 20 years.
I'm saying it because it really is obvious from even casual
consideration
that LOGIC means NOTHING to these people! They DON'T CARE if you/we
have
a proof! THEY have THEIR canards and maxims and precepts, and THAT'S
ALL
THEY care about! Progress is not really possible along a merely
intellectual
front (merely intellectual, our position is simply far too easy to
confirm).
A unified wall of contempt stands a better chance.
|
|
