Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: photons split into neutrinos in polarization experiments? Chapt15.34
explaining Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1108 New Physics #1228
ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 1   Last Post: Dec 23, 2012 2:04 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com

Posts: 9,277
Registered: 3/31/08
photons split into neutrinos in polarization experiments? Chapt15.34
explaining Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1108 New Physics #1228
ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Dec 23, 2012 1:32 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

So now, if we find that photons split into neutrinos, how is that
going to help us in understanding of superconductivity? Well it is
pretty straightforward. For if we define conductivity with resistance
then some of the photon messengers that tell electrons to move are
absorbed. If those messengers are neutrinos, they still signal the
electrons to move but neutrinos are never absorbed by the material and
hence no resistance.

Alright, I had a chance to review this film:

It is the video series produced by Caltech called "The Mechanical
Universe" showing David Goodstein as lecturer. It is the #50 video ?of
Particles and Waves which at the end shows Goodstein in a
polarization demonstration.

Rather ironic that David kept calling his explanation "the new
physics"
when clearly it is Old Physics of a single-transverse wave and not a
double
transverse wave.

But what I want to evaluate and determine is whether the photons are
100% absorbed into the polarization filters as heat, or whether the
photons are not absorbed and are split apart into neutrinos that
travel beyond the last filter.
I suppose one way of doing that is to have a neutrino detector at the
last filter.
Now David spoke of the fact that the filters may be a bit dirty that
some of the light does not get through, but what I am concerned about
is when the two filters, one vertical and one horizontal that no light
gets through, does the filters heat up and is that where the photons
end up? Or, as my hunch goes, the photons split into neutrinos.

The fact that you can produce glasses or goggles that are laser
resistant is evidence in support of the idea that photons split apart
into neutrinos. As seen in this YouTube demonstration:
?www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxRoaSIiBxM
So it is looking good for my hunch but we will not be certain until
the experiments
tell us so.
Now there is also a related experiment involving mirrors. Do mirrors
heat up
at the point of contact of angle of incidence and angle of reflection.
I am not saying the photon splits into neutrinos in reflection. I am
saying the photons split into neutrinos in cases of being stopped. So
that the photon is not stopped by moves on as two or more neutrinos.

Google's New-Newsgroups censors AP posts and halted a proper archiving
of author, but Drexel's Math Forum does not and my posts in archive
form is seen here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.