Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Replies: 27   Last Post: Dec 30, 2012 12:20 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
george

Posts: 800
Registered: 8/5/08
Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Posted: Dec 24, 2012 10:17 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Dec 24, 6:29 am, hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---
undress to reply) wrote:
> You are missing the point.  The whole idea of the diagonal argument is

No, Phil, YOU are missing the point. YOU ARE NEW.
Herc has been here FOR A DECADE. YOU should look back.
Everything you are about to say HAS BEEN SAID a dozen times
already. HE KNOWS the list is presumably exhaustive.
He is trying to say that because you have to create infinitely many
changes,
YOU JUST CAN"T, because you never finish or it's too hard. What he
ACTUALLY
doesn't understand is that there is a logical inference rule called
universal generalization.
What he actually doesn't understand is that this rule does NOT give A
FLYING FUCK how
huge the domain of discourse (over which it is generalizing) may be --
there is NOT any issue of TIME OR SEQUENTIALITY in performing
(whatever) over each individual element of the domain -- the
generalization is asserted or true about ALL OF THEM AT ONCE. But he
thinks that merely pointing out that a process is infinitary somehow
proves it can't complete.


Date Subject Author
12/24/12
Read Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Graham Cooper
12/24/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
J. Antonio Perez M.
12/24/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
12/24/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
george
12/24/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de
12/24/12
Read Re: "Simple" Refutation of Cantor's Proof Fails
Virgil
12/25/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to reply
12/25/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
12/25/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
patmpowers@gmail.com
12/24/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
george
12/29/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Graham Cooper
12/29/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Virgil
12/29/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
camgirls@hush.com
12/29/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Virgil
12/29/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Graham Cooper
12/30/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Virgil
12/24/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
george
12/24/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
William Hughes
12/24/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Graham Cooper
12/25/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Virgil
12/25/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Graham Cooper
12/25/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Virgil
12/25/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Graham Cooper
12/25/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Virgil
12/25/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Graham Cooper
12/25/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Virgil
12/26/12
Read Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Graham Cooper
12/26/12
Read Re: Simple NON-Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Virgil

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.