
Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Posted:
Dec 25, 2012 8:30 AM


On Dec 25, 4:25 pm, hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig undress to reply) wrote: > In article > <a8c69f87538649d8bc4f088cdfe6a...@p17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>, > > George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> writes: > > On Dec 24, 6:29=A0am, hel...@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig > > undress to reply) wrote: > > > You are missing the point. =A0The whole idea of the diagonal argument is > > > No, Phil, YOU are missing the point. YOU ARE NEW. > > Herc has been here FOR A DECADE. YOU should look back. > > Everything you are about to say HAS BEEN SAID a dozen times > > already. > > Right, being in a newsgroup for 10 years automatically means that one > must have refuted a proof which professional mathematicians believe is > OK. Right. Conquering usenet is not the same as conquering the world. > > Why is he still posting the same stuff after 10 years? Why hasn't he > submitted it to a journal, won the Fields medal etc?
It's the conspiracy of orthodoxy, numnuts.

