
Re: Simple Refutation of Cantor's Proof
Posted:
Dec 29, 2012 7:19 PM


On Dec 30, 9:22 am, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > NOTHING EVER *NEEDS* to be constructed, DUMBASS! > > > YOU DON'T represent the function f(x)=2*x by > > > The derivative f'(x)=2 > > > The integral f*(x)=x^2 > > AN integral, but not THE integral. > >
It HAS an integral!
It HAS a derivative.
Your imaginary textual froth you make up and call functions DO NOT!!
AD(pos) = 6 IFF DIAG(pos) < 5 AD(pos) = 5 OTHERWISE
What is the DERIVATIVE of that RUBBISH?
You CLAIM it is completed to INFINITY!
W H A T * I S * T H E * I N T E G R A L ?
ANWER THE QUESTIONS VIRGIL
OR STOP TRASHING ALL MY POSTS!
Herc

