Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Topic: The Diagonal Argument
Replies: 28   Last Post: Dec 29, 2012 12:11 AM

 Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
 Graham Cooper Posts: 4,495 Registered: 5/20/10
Re: The Diagonal Argument
Posted: Dec 28, 2012 3:44 AM

On Dec 28, 2:10 pm, George Greene <gree...@email.unc.edu> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2:43 pm, Graham Cooper <grahamcoop...@gmail.com> wrote:
>

> > Try to Visualise an example.
>
> YOU DON'T *HAVE* ANY *EXAMPLES*, *DUMBASS*!!
> *YOU* ARE *NOT* the one TEACHING this class!  *I* AM!!
>

*piffle*

>
> > L(x,y)
> > +---------------->
> > | 0. 2 3 4 5 6 7 ..
> > | 0. 9 8 7 6 5 5 ..
> > | 0. 1 2 3 1 2 3 ..
> > | 0. 9 8 9 8 9 8 ..
> > | 0. 6 5 6 5 6 5 ..
> > | 0. 5 6 5 6 5 6 ..
> > |
> > v

>
> > Now apply your FLIP(d) function to the whole plane
>
> > T(x,y)
> > +---------------->
> > | 0. 6 6 6 6 5 5 ..
> > | 0. 5 5 5 5 6 6 ..
> > | 0. 6 6 6 6 6 6 ..
> > | 0. 5 5 5 5 5 5 ..
> > | 0. 5 6 5 6 5 6 ..
> > | 0. 6 5 6 5 6 5 ..
> > |
> > v

>
> > Your claim is that is you take any path from
>
> > T(1,?)
> > T(2,?)
> > T(3,?)
> > ...

>
> > and repeat that process you must end up with an infinite string absent
> > from L?

>
> NO, DUMBASS, THAT IS NOT ANYbody's claim.

Then you agree

0. T(1,2) T(2,1) T(3,3) T(4,4) T(5,5) T(6,6) ...

is potentially ON THE LIST L!

THANK YOU and Good Night!

Herc

Date Subject Author
12/26/12 Graham Cooper
12/26/12 Virgil
12/26/12 george
12/26/12 Virgil
12/26/12 Graham Cooper
12/27/12 Graham Cooper
12/27/12 Virgil
12/27/12 Graham Cooper
12/27/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/27/12 Graham Cooper
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 ross.finlayson@gmail.com
12/29/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Graham Cooper
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Graham Cooper
12/28/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Graham Cooper
12/29/12 Virgil
12/28/12 Graham Cooper
12/29/12 Virgil
12/26/12 J. Antonio Perez M.