I am going to go ahead and try to make at least a start, or inroad to what the neutrino is in terms of magnetic monopoles. Somewhat like the US Marines faced in island hopping in Asia in WW2, in that they had to get a beach toehold on the island first, before they could embark on a takeover. So I want to get a beach toehold on the neutrino in this edition of the book, rather than nothing to go forward in the next edition.
But before I attack the neutrino again, let me tie up some loose ends with the Faraday law and superconductivity.
Now I spoke of doing the Faraday law on superconduction materials at or below the transition temperature to see if there is any sort of "new physics" not anticipated. And I said that we can never understand superconductivity if we never know what is "resistance" in terms of the Maxwell Equations. Now I found what resistance is in the Maxwell Equations as a polarization or phase change of photons and electrons. When a conductor of electricity has resistance in the wire, is because like Malus law of intensity, only a fraction of the photons get through (or electrons get through). When the Malus law has cross filters, one vertical and other horizontal, none get through and that is like a insulator such as a glass material in electricity. So here is a good showing of the Faraday law
Now I do not know if any of the high temperature superconductor materials at room temperature can show the Faraday law as shown above in that YouTube demonstration. Hopefully there is one that is operable at room temperature. If not, I suppose we can use mercury, for it becomes a solid soon after lowering the temperature and it is solid at superconduction of about 4 K. But I hope we can use a different material than that of mercury.
So what I need to perform is a experiment that repeats the above YouTube demonstration at room temperature and then to lower the temperature to superconductive state and see if the results are different. I need to show the galvanometer reading for the batteries and for the Faraday law. Hopefully we can make the experiment to where the batteries and the moving bar magnet register the same voltage/ current.
And also, what I like to have performed is a more thorough analysis, of showing the bar magnet moving outside the coil to see if any current registers.
So now, applying the theory, the reason the superconduction state occurs is because according to Malus law, if the emf is a polarization of where the cosine function has a value of 1, then the intensity in is equal to the intensity out, or that the current in experiences no resistance for there was no phase change.
For a conductor like copper or silver, the Malus law would not be a value of 1 for no resistance but rather be very close to 1, say for example 0.75 where 100% of the electricity in has 75% of that electricity out.
And the Malus law would explain why superconductivity has Type I and Type II superconductors, in that the photons and electrons of electricity have both a wavefront and have a pilot-wave. Their waves consist of two waves in one where they have 2 E fields. Because of the variances of the two E fields, we have two types of penetration by the magnetic field.
Google's New-Newsgroups halted a proper archiving ?of AP posts, but Drexel's Math Forum has my posts in ?sequential archive form as seen here: