Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum


Math Forum
 Ask Dr. Math
 Discussions
 Internet Newsletter
 MathTools
 Problems of the Week
 Teacher2Teacher
 Teacher Exchange
 Workshops

Search All of the Math Forum:
Browse our Internet Mathematics Library

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Proof of the Collatz Conjecture
Replies: 12   Last Post: Jan 12, 2013 11:19 PM

Advanced Search
Reply to this Topic Reply to this Topic

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
William Elliot

Posts: 593
Registered: 1/8/12
Revised Proof of the Collatz Conjecture
Posted: Jan 12, 2013 10:02 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

On Sat, 12 Jan 2013, markofmod@gmail.com wrote:

> I now have a proof that there are no cycles other than the trivial (1,2)
> cycle for the Collatz function on the positive integers. I have replaced
> my previous paper (the flawed proof of the Collatz conjecture) with this
> new paper at the same link.
>
> I am continuing to meet with my colleagues and discuss the matter. As
> always, I would appreciate any and all comments, even if you just want
> to call me a "delusional crank" again.

You're delusional to think this group remembers your precious link.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.