Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
longitudinal wave Chapt15.36 explaining the neutrino from the Maxwell
Equations #1122 New Physics #1242 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Dec 29, 2012 3:16 AM
|
|
Alright, I am determined to make some inroads into the understanding
of what neutrinos are. As I have done so many times before, when faced
with difficult problem, and having postulated that the Maxwell
Equations derives all of physics, then I have to go back to the
Symmetrical Maxwell Equations and pull out what those equations would
say about the neutrino.
We know five facts about neutrinos that are essential. 1) We know they
carry away mass/energy once a neutron decays apart into proton,
electron and neutrino. So neutrinos serve as a accounting for mass and
energy. 2) And we know that neutrinos all have a left handed chiral
geometry. 3) And we know that neutrinos overall are less energy than
photons overall, meaning that the average common neutrino is far less
in energy than the average common photon, so that we can say the
neutrino is primitive compared to the photon which is more complex.
4)
And the neutrino seems to be associated only with
electrons, not protons, for we have the electron, muon and tau
neutrinos. And this is important in that the electron is hyperbolic
geometry while the proton is elliptic and the photon is plane
Euclidean geometry.
5) And finally, we can safely say the neutrino speed is the speed of
light, for if it were less, our experiments would have uncovered it by
now.
So now, if we put all those 5 considerations of fact into the Maxwell
Equations, is there something we can extract out of the Maxwell
Equations that may give us a deeper understanding of what the neutrino
actually is?
Well, I spent the entire day trying to do that. To fit those 5 facts
into the Maxwell Equations and I am happy to say, that one thing does
come out of the Maxwell Equations, the symmetrical equations with the
magnetic monopoles. It comes from the Faraday law of its J term, or,
magnetic current density.
Essentially what it says is that the neutrino as a wave is not a
transverse wave but rather a longitudinal wave and that would account
for why the chirality is always left handed.
Now, I am a highly logical thinking person and studied science
throughout my life. And I know of only one place in all of physics
that has a longitudinal wave which is the sound wave. There is no
longitudinal wave in the Maxwell Equations without magnetic monopoles.
But when you include magnetic monopoles, you open the door for a
necessity of a longitudinal wave.
The lines-of-force of physics is the photons and those photons are the
fabric of space, but not just photons alone but magnetic monopoles. So
if you picture space as lines-of-force of photons and magnetic
monopoles, then you have a medium for which longitudinal waves can
traverse. Sound exists because atoms fill the Space of planet Earth
and those atomic vibrations create longitudinal waves.
Now the Ampere/Maxwell law has a "displacement current". The
displacement current and the magnetic current density, those two
entities maybe related so that they give rise to a longitudinal wave
front.
So that when a free Neutron decays, there is a small amount of energy
that needs to be accounted for, sort of like when people move out of a
home to a new home they take most of their material, but a few items
to be accounted for end up at the trash dump.
So as the neutron decays, some energy is emitted that is formed from
the proton and electron and becomes a longitudinal wave of a neutrino.
Now to keep the chirality correct of the longitudinal wave, it is not
a straight line of Euclidean geometry but a curved line of hyperbolic
geometry. A hyperbola. Although a very small bending of the hyperbola
compared to a straight line. Which would give experimental physicists
something to look for.
Google's New-Newsgroups halted a proper archiving ?of AP posts, but
Drexel's Math Forum has my posts in ?sequential archive form as seen
here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
|
|
|
