Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: sound waves have much in common with neutrinos Chapt15.36 explaining
the neutrino from the Maxwell Equations #1124 New Physics #1244 ATOM TOTALITY
5th ed

Replies: 4   Last Post: Dec 30, 2012 8:21 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com

Posts: 7,401
Registered: 3/31/08
sound waves have much in common with neutrinos Chapt15.36 explaining
the neutrino from the Maxwell Equations #1124 New Physics #1244 ATOM TOTALITY
5th ed

Posted: Dec 30, 2012 2:01 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


Now let me add a 6th fact about neutrinos, in that they easily go
through matter without ever any interaction. Does this not sound
familiar ( not sorry for the pun)? Sound waves are longitudinal and
require matter to propagate. So here we have the neutrino behaving as
going through matter, regardless of density and coming out unscathed,
which is exactly how sound waves behave.

Sound is not a particle but a form of energy in a wavepacket.
Neutrinos are not elementary particles of physics such as the proton,
electron, photon, because a elementary particle of physics must
conform to the double slit experiment where the elementary particle is
both particle and wave. In the case of the neutrino, it is never a
particle, and always a wave, a energy wave. The neutrino can never be
a double slit particle.

And has anyone dared send sound waves into a double slit experiment,
expecting the results that the electron or proton or photon give? Of
course not.

So here I am with the Symmetrical Maxwell Equations as the axioms over
all of physics. All of physics derived from facts of chemistry and the
4 Maxwell Equations. What elementary particles do the Maxwell
Equations give up? They give up the electron, proton, and photon. They
give up a pure energy wave called the magnetic monopoles, and some
have called them neutrinos in the past century. Neutrinos are nothing
more than magnetic monopoles and they are energy wavepackets.

The displacement current in the Ampere/Maxwell law is a magnetic
monopole wavepacket. The magnetic current density term J in the
Faraday law is a energy wavepacket, never a particle/s.

The voltage in Maxwell theory, or emf, electromotive force, or
potential difference is a wavepacket of energy composed of magnetic
monopoles. The potential difference comes as a longitudinal wavefront,
for as soon as the batteries are connected to a closed loop wire, the
potential difference is transmitted the length of the circuit at the
speed of light. It cannot be a transverse wave but rather instead a
longitudinal wavepacket.

Now let me comment on the Malus law as the resistance in Ohm's law.
Consider the finest and best normal conductor of all the elements is
silver.
Yet silver is nowhere near a resistance of 0 that a superconductor
has. So what angle of polarization would the longitudinal wave of the
voltage (those magnetic monopoles that some call neutrinos), what
angle do we have to have in the Malus law to match the resistance of
silver. For the angle in the superconductor is quite simple and easy
for the cosine of 0 is that of 1, allowing all the light or electrons
in the current to go through with 0 resistance.

Now my chore or job of reconciling the rest-mass, spin, speed, charge
are made so much easier. Rest-mass exists only for particles of 1/2
spin. The spin of the photon is 0. The neutrino is never a particle,
but always a wave. Particles in physics are only electron, proton and
photon and everything else is a composite of just these three. The
neutrino is magnetic monopoles of pure energy in longitudinal
wavepackets.

So I no longer have to wrestle with pointless wrestling that the hoax
and fakery of the Standard Model of Old Physics. That was a pathetic
mathematical game without ever the intervention of reasoning,
experimental results and the Maxwell Equations. The Standard Model and
its Higgs boson were crackpot physics. In the Ancient science world,
they also had some crackpot science called the 4 Humors or 4
Temperaments-- yellow bile, black bile, phlegm, blood and depending on
the proportions of these 4 that a person had, they determined the
health and personality of the person in question. Utter nonsense now
to any scientist, but in the time of Hippocrates that was the state of
art of medicine. Compare that to the nonsense and crackpot that the
Standard Model with Higgs boson is to modern physics, where physicists
still do not even realize that a photon can only have a constant speed
if it were a double transverse wave.

You see, the trouble with modern day physics and the sciences, is that
few if any, have a logical scientific mind. A logical scientific mind
wants to hold some features of physics as solid foundational starting
points-- the Maxwell Equations, and if any idea contradicts or does
not derive out of the Maxwell Equations, well, you exited physics and
has joined with the crackpot league.

Google's New-Newsgroups halted a proper archiving?of AP posts, but
Drexel's Math Forum has my posts in ?sequential archive form as seen
here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium ?whole entire Universe is just one big
atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.