GogoJF
Posts:
48
Registered:
12/16/09
|
|
Re: What is or is not a paradox?
Posted:
Jan 2, 2013 9:25 PM
|
|
On Jan 2, 8:14 pm, John Gogo <jfgog...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 2, 12:38 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 2, 10:07 am, Tom Roberts wrote:
>
> > > [snipped SR sermons]
>
> > > At present, there are no experiments that refute SR.
>
> > > [snipped more SR scriptures]
>
> > > But this process won't start until there is some real experiment that is
> > > inconsistent with SR. Until then all you have is dreams and hallucinations,
> > > which aren't science.
>
> > Given two hypotheses where each is an antithesis to and thus
> > invalidates the other, the common sense says one must find experiments
> > to validate only one of the hypotheses. This is scientific method.
> > Tom has bragged about these experimental verifications for SR since he
> > became a priest to SR long away. Yet, these experimental
> > verifications (every single one of them with no exceptions) also
> > verify any of the antitheses to SR. Thus, claiming SR valid because
> > it is verified by all sorts of experiments is just plain stupid, lack
> > of professionalism, misapplication of scientific method, and downright
> > deceitful. This is not science anymore but a voodoo cult. <shrug>
>
> > Antitheses to SR are:
>
> > ** Voigt transformation
> > ** Larmor?s transformation
> > ** Infinite transformations discovered by Lorentz
>
> > Each one says the Aether must exist. Each one satisfies the null
> > results of the MMX and more. <shrug>
>
> > The following sum up the self-styled physicists.
>
> > ** FAITH IS LOGIC
> > ** LYING IS TEACHING
> > ** DECEIT IS VALIDATION
> > ** NITWIT IS GENIUS
> > ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
> > ** FICTION IS THEORY
> > ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
> > ** PARADOX IS KOSHER
> > ** WORSHIP IS STUDY
> > ** BULLSHIT IS TRUTH
> > ** ARROGANCE IS SAGE
> > ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
> > ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
> > ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
> > ** SCRIPTURE IS AXIOM
> > ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
> > ** HANDWAVING IS REASONING
> > ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
> > ** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE
> > ** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT
> > ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS
> > ** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY
> > ** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION
>
> > <shrug>
>
> This reminds me of the Young/Forbes toothed-wheel of 1891- the toothed-
> wheel observed two line of sight light sources that were separated by
> a distance- and determined that their distances were instant and
> simultaneous through the aperture of the wheel. This at once, created
> extreme criticism because it predicted something that was not
> anticipated like the results of the MM experiment.
It is the models which produce the philosophical paradoxes. If
Michelson would have predicted an aether- relativity would have lived
an everlasting life. But, this did not happen.
|
|
