On Jan 2, 8:14 pm, John Gogo <jfgog...@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jan 2, 12:38 pm, Koobee Wublee <koobee.wub...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Jan 2, 10:07 am, Tom Roberts wrote: > > > > [snipped SR sermons] > > > > At present, there are no experiments that refute SR. > > > > [snipped more SR scriptures] > > > > But this process won't start until there is some real experiment that is > > > inconsistent with SR. Until then all you have is dreams and hallucinations, > > > which aren't science. > > > Given two hypotheses where each is an antithesis to and thus > > invalidates the other, the common sense says one must find experiments > > to validate only one of the hypotheses. This is scientific method. > > Tom has bragged about these experimental verifications for SR since he > > became a priest to SR long away. Yet, these experimental > > verifications (every single one of them with no exceptions) also > > verify any of the antitheses to SR. Thus, claiming SR valid because > > it is verified by all sorts of experiments is just plain stupid, lack > > of professionalism, misapplication of scientific method, and downright > > deceitful. This is not science anymore but a voodoo cult. <shrug> > > > Antitheses to SR are: > > > ** Voigt transformation > > ** Larmor?s transformation > > ** Infinite transformations discovered by Lorentz > > > Each one says the Aether must exist. Each one satisfies the null > > results of the MMX and more. <shrug> > > > The following sum up the self-styled physicists. > > > ** FAITH IS LOGIC > > ** LYING IS TEACHING > > ** DECEIT IS VALIDATION > > ** NITWIT IS GENIUS > > ** OCCULT IS SCIENCE > > ** FICTION IS THEORY > > ** FUDGING IS DERIVATION > > ** PARADOX IS KOSHER > > ** WORSHIP IS STUDY > > ** BULLSHIT IS TRUTH > > ** ARROGANCE IS SAGE > > ** BELIEVING IS LEARNING > > ** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE > > ** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM > > ** SCRIPTURE IS AXIOM > > ** CONJECTURE IS REALITY > > ** HANDWAVING IS REASONING > > ** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY > > ** PRIESTHOOD IS TENURE > > ** FRAUDULENCE IS FACT > > ** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS > > ** INCONSISTENCY IS CONSISTENCY > > ** INTERPRETATION IS VERIFICATION > > > <shrug> > > This reminds me of the Young/Forbes toothed-wheel of 1891- the toothed- > wheel observed two line of sight light sources that were separated by > a distance- and determined that their distances were instant and > simultaneous through the aperture of the wheel. This at once, created > extreme criticism because it predicted something that was not > anticipated like the results of the MM experiment.
It is the models which produce the philosophical paradoxes. If Michelson would have predicted an aether- relativity would have lived an everlasting life. But, this did not happen.