On Jan 4, 9:13 am, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4 Jan, 13:09, Pubkeybreaker <pubkeybrea...@aol.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jan 4, 12:01 am, JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Does the RSA challenges have a given time complexity of factoring the > > > primeproduct, or did they have one that changed during resent years? > > > If I could figure out what you are asking, I would answer..... > > > What is a "RSA challenges have a given time complexity"? What does > > "given" > > mean in this context? Why do you ask only about RSA challenges? > > > Are you asking for the time complexity of the fastest known general > > purpose factoring algorithm? > > > It is exp( (C+o(1)) (log N)^1/3 (loglog N)^2/3) where C = > > (64/9)^1/3 > > > As for the second part, what do you mean by "recent"? > > > The time complexity has changed over the last 10 years, > > but only the o(1) term. > > Well i thought that any task that require computational work had time > complexity? And that time complexity describes the amount of work > needed that is generally needed to solve a problem. > Does not factoring primeproduct have time complexity?
I gave the time complexity for the fastest known algorithm (Number Field Sieve). Reread my post.
> It was along time since i read about sorting algorithms or did any > discrete math. > And i thought the work of bruteforcing a primeproduct could be given a > time complexity just like sorting problems.
It can. But noone factors large numbers by brute force.