The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: energy and rest-mass problems Chapt15.38 Maxwell Equations as axioms
of physics solves rest-mass, charge, spin, speed #1140 New Physics #1260 ATOM

Replies: 7   Last Post: Jan 8, 2013 3:04 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,572
Registered: 3/31/08
energy and rest-mass problems Chapt15.38 Maxwell Equations as axioms
of physics solves rest-mass, charge, spin, speed #1140 New Physics #1260 ATOM

Posted: Jan 7, 2013 5:10 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Time and time again, I seem to be floundering when I try to make
headway with rest-mass and energy. I
seem to flounder when it comes to deriving 500,000 eV for electron and
938,000,000 eV for proton.
I do not flounder when I bring in the Atom Totality theory on that
item, but when I try to derive it purely from Maxwell Equations, I
flounder. This must have been about the 3rd attempt at doing this, and
no clear path through. However, there was magnificent progress on
other fronts. There was the derivation of both the Dirac and
Schrodinger Equations out of the Maxwell Equations. And there was
magnificent progress in understanding the phenomenon of
superconductivity as a form of Malus law replacing resistance in the
Ohm's law.

And we can further see how this rings true in that
E = mc^2


I' = I" cos^2A (Malus law)

notice both equations are of the form p =qk^2 which is a area in
Elliptic geometry. An area in Euclidean geometry is p = length *

So the I" term in Malus law is initial intensity of light.

So if we alter the equation E = mc^2 we get this:

m' = m"c^2

In other words, the initial mass m", some of which was altered into
becoming a new mass of m'. Just as in Malus law, the initial beam of
light energy I" is altered and out comes the final beam of light
energy of I'.

Likewise, instead of shooting a beam of laser light into a steel wool
and seeing most of the energy altered and few if any of the laser
light coming out, we send positrons into a filter of electrons and the
positrons all annihilate with no positrons coming out.

So here we see how Malus law is the equivalent of E = mc^2.

So here we see what rest-mass and energy really are, because each
converts to the other, but questions remain. Because, where does that
energy or rest-mass end up with at the end of the interaction? Does it
end up with magnetic monopoles rearranged? Does it end up with
magnetic monopoles becoming part of Space?

-- ?Google's archiving of posts is biased towards attacks on people,
with ?delays in time and search engine bombing stacking. If ?anyone
searches for Archimedes Plutonium in the Google science newsgroups is
likely?to not come upon current AP posts but rather?instead come upon
hate- spew stacking in front, rather than the current actual AP
posts. ?Organizations such as Docendi of ?science,niuz,biz or from
Spacebanter ?are given higher priority even though they are
inflammatory posts lacking ?science content, and not representative of
AP current posts, but rather posts designed to scare away a new reader
from AP. In the past?months, a Google search for ?AP posts is nothing
more than a gaggle of hate-spew from to Spacebanter. These
inflammatory posts even ?hinder the proper Google archiving?of actual
AP. ?Whoever is doing it (such as the hatemonger, Tim Skirvin in the
past)?knows how to pick out inflammatory words in subject headers and
then couple that with a ?AP post, so that a reader is repulsed.
Whether they are employees of ?Google or simply know how to manipulate
Google archiving is unknown, ?but when compared to Drexel's archiving
we see how Google could operate far better. Google was a prime
inventor of search-engines but
Google seems to be derelict of its role in trying to minimize those
creeps who keep biasing searches with their hate-spew. These creeps
even have a name for their foul behaviour-- grepping. If Google can
spend a little time and attention to eradicting grepping, then their
overall business would also improve. A source of grepping is the use
of fake names and another source is unlimited volume. So if Google
were to enforce 1) legal names only and 2) volume quota, then we would
have improved Internet.

Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent and fair archiving of
AP ?posts for the past 10 or more years as seen here:

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.