The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: deriving proton/electron rest-mass ratio Chapt15.38 Maxwell Equations
as axioms of physics solves rest-mass, charge, spin, speed, Space, Energy
#1147 New Physics #1267 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 1   Last Post: Jan 10, 2013 10:16 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 18,572
Registered: 3/31/08
deriving proton/electron rest-mass ratio Chapt15.38 Maxwell Equations
as axioms of physics solves rest-mass, charge, spin, speed, Space, Energy
#1147 New Physics #1267 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Jan 10, 2013 5:14 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

In this edition of this textbook, I was hoping to derive rest-mass
ratio of proton to electron via magnetic monopoles. Looks like that is
not going to happen anytime soon. However, back in 2010 I was able to
derive the rest-mass ration of proton/electron fairly easily using the
Atom Totality theory.

Now before I discuss the derivation, let me point out that many in
physics feel that a derivation must be an integral multiple of pi. Why
they feel that way I am not sure. But to their delight, I derive the
proton/electron ratio as a multiple of pi.

Here is what I wrote in a previous edition in 2010.

> (i) Alright, so I have the number "pi" from pure physics as 22
> subshells in 7 shells
> of the 231Pu Atom Totality

Comment: so here we see familar pi as subshells/shells, or, 22/7 in
rational form

> (ii) I have the number "e" from pure physics as 19 occupied subshells
> in 7 shells

Comment: if a derivation is true in physics for pi, then it should
hold true for "e" also for the two constants of mathematics are
linked. And here we recognize that the Atom Totality has 22 subshells
in full for 231Plutonium but it has only 19 of those 22 subshells
filled at any one instant of time.

> (iii) I have the Fine-Structure Constant as 22 / (22/7)^7 from pure
> physics

Comment: so now, 231Pu Atom Totality derived pi and e, and it should
derive the most important constant of physics, the Fine Structure
constant that permeates throughout the Maxwell Equations. And it
should derive it purely from pi. Now because it uses a 7 exponent,
that indicates a energy term as being the 7th energy level of the
s,p,d,f suborbitals. This clue leads into the derivation of the proton/
electron mass ratio in that a exponent is involved.

> (iv) I have the mass ratio of proton to electron as 6 (22/7)^5 from
> the fact that
> 231Pu has the 5f6 energy level, where the fifth energy level has
> exponent 5
> and the seventh energy level has exponent 7 in Fine Structure
> Constant.

Comment: Now I used 22/7 as 3.142 to get 306.21 x 6 = 1837.3. Now
Dirac's Directions in Physics, he wrote that the ratio is approx 1840
and I will leave it at that.

I will also say, that the above is the first time in the history of
physics that anyone has derived the constants of pi, e, fine-structure
and proton/electron mass ratio where all four constants are linked
together into a logical structure.

> (v) Now I have the Speed of Light from pure math and it is :
> speed of light = summation of meridian strips distance / log-spiral-
> radius

Comment, well that is not linked to the above, and that was a novel
new way of deriving the speed of light and is probably but the fact
that the Maxwell Equations derives the speed of light is a linkage

Now maybe the magnetic monopoles have a means of deriving the rest-
mass ratios, but for now, there is no progress on that account.

Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-
bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and
fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.