On 22/02/2013 06:05, Richard Fateman wrote: > > Anyway, getting back to Mathematica and Lisp... > Since Lisp programs tend to be short, there are fewer opportunities > for bugs. Mathematica programs can be short too, but the irregular > syntax makes them harder to read. See djmpark's comment about FullForm > below. Lisp is like FullForm all the time. >
Yes Lisp is rather like FullForm - but who in their right mind would write all their Mathematica code in FullForm!
The beauty of FullForm, is that you can render an expression into this form to resolve any misconceptions you may have about operator precedences etc.
Since practically nobody writes all their Mathematica code in FullForm, it follows, does it not, that they must find Mathematica code significantly (I would say massively) more readable than Lisp!