Robert Hansen (RH) posted Jan 21, 2013 7:34 PM: > > On Jan 21, 2013, at 8:21 AM, GS Chandy > <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > >> Given that this problem takes very little time to > >> solve (especially in a group), and that the > students > >> had considerable time to solve it, and didn't, all > >> the scratch work will show is that the students > where > >> lost at step 1. Or, in your words, most students > >> "guessed" wrong, and a couple students weren't > >> exactly "guessing". > >> > >> Bob Hansen > >> > > So in what way is your 'response' actually > responding to any of the substantive issues about > learning that had been raised? A copy of the points > raised is pasted below my signature for ready > reference. > > I was pointing out that you two are lost at step 1.:) > > Bob Hansen > It would be useful if you'd try and understand what was written before you point out where, in your opinion, we 'got lost'.