|
|
testing out the Malus law replacement in Ohm's law of the Faraday law
Chapt15.34 explaining Superconductivity from Maxwell Equations #1174 New
Physics #1294 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Jan 23, 2013 1:05 PM
|
|
Testing out the Malus law replacement in Ohm's law of the Faraday law.
Now then, in my prior post I showed where Faraday's law is Ohm's law:
In Faraday's law as stated by:
emf = -N dB/dt
where 1/N is Resistance, and dB/dt is Voltage and
emf is current i, and where we delete the negative sign.
So Faraday's law becomes:
i = V/R
Now for superconductivity, the R becomes another function of the Malus
law I' = I" cos^2 A.
So we replace R in i = V/R with the Malus law
i = V/(I"cos^2A)
Now let us check out in an experiment whether that is what happens in
physics.
On page 740 of Halliday & Resnick, Fundamentals of Physics, 3rd
edition, 1988, shows experiment one
of what is likely a remake of what Faraday did in the 1830s of his
famous Faraday law. On page 740 shows a closed loop wire connected to
a Galvanometer, G, and a hand holding a bar magnet aimed at moving
into the center of the closed loop of wire and by the motion, the G
should register a small electric current.
Now, to test out whether the Malus law is applicable, we re-do that
experiment and hold the bar magnet so that it does not move into the
center at a perpendicular to the wire loop cross section area. We move
the bar magnet at a oblique angle, just as in Malus law, we have a
oblique polarized filter.
So, the question is, how does the current in G register with the bar
magnet motion at oblique angles?
--
Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-
bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and
fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
|
