The crux of this issue may be local and that is the only reason I'm in the loop of this... In essense, Rice University seems keen on the folding of dimentions paradigm... Is folding computerish? It seems like it must be the case since the rest of the world seems dismissive of it... What should I make of the argument that folding dimentions is needed to support the ambitions of 'MapQuest' and 'Google Maps', etc? Is it that the internet is on a course that needs to support frame matching parallels to the actual thing? Well, what I say is that there may be an issue with boundary value problems... A square wave utilizes frame matching/frame shifting to determine where a clock signal begins after you turn on the power to the clock.