Virgil
Posts:
4,482
Registered:
1/6/11
|
|
Re: Endorsement of Wolfgang Mueckenheim from a serious mathematician
Posted:
Feb 1, 2013 6:57 PM
|
|
In article
<3d87da9a-ca7d-4635-b46f-e753dad78eef@r3g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
WM <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> On 1 Feb., 10:23, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <abc2008b-5c80-44c6-9091-22f125692...@h2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
> > > And if I append to every finite path every infinite tail that has a
> > > finite definition like 0.[001]? What will you choose then???
> > > Nevertheles I will have used only countably many paths yet.
> >
> > That you have only used countably many does not mean that there are not
> > many more than you have used.
> >
> > And is has been shown many times, and beyond WM's ability to falsify,
> > that the number of paths in a Complete Infinite Binary Tree is beyond
> > counting (that is, there is not, and cannot be, any mapping from |N to
> > the set of paths that uses us every path.
>
> And it has been shown, unfortunately beyond Virgils ability to
> comprehend the consequences, that there are not more reals in
> mathematics. Therefore, we have a contradiction.
>
Not outside of Wolkenmuekenheim.
In the world of tertium non datur, Wolkenmuekenheim also non datur.
--
|
|
