On 23 Feb, 08:46, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <414addb8-8932-4800-b866-c5032e800...@g16g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11 Feb, 00:17, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > In article > > > <61208bd6-9348-44cd-98e6-14e4c7681...@hl5g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, > > > > JT<jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Below ternary fractions in NyaN > > > > Paragraphs for empty preceding > > > > entrys to keep track of multiple * bas (Ternary=1,3,9,27,81....) > > > > > Fractions = NyaN ternary fraction > > > > 1/3 = .1 > > > > 2/3 = .2 > > > > 1/9 = .(1)1 > > > > 2/9 = .(1)2 > > > > 1/27 = .(2)1 > > > > 2/27 = .(2)2 > > > > 1/81 = .(3)1 > > > > 2/81 = .(3)2 ... > > > > Since 0's in standard notation are merely placeholders, you still > > > apparently need placeholders. > > > > HOW IS 1/81 = .(3)3 BETTER THAN 1/81 =.0001 in base 3? > > > -- > > > No there is no placeholders needed for the naturals because they are > > discrete incremental entities > > In decimal notation, 10 and 100 and 1000, and so forth all require > placeholders.
No they do not need ask the romans they used X, but for us maybe A would be more suitable. Now you have 123456789A or 123456789X instead of 0123456789 you may notice the zero is gone.
zero is just a distraction performing math, especially when dividing writing without zeros have great computational advantages when it come to factoring, it may also come with some insight into prime number distribution so finally someone can crack the mystery of the Riemann zeta function.
> > \ the fractions though are parts of the > > continuum and expressed as part of one whole. This does not mean there > > is really any numerical value to the preceding zeros as you as well > > could write it as 10^-3 or A^-3. > > And how is writing 5*10^-3 any less placeholder dependent that 0.005? > > In one way or another, the existenceof places holding 0's must be noted. > --