|
|
Re: Finite Rings
Posted:
Feb 5, 2013 10:13 PM
|
|
On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Arturo Magidin wrote: > > Yet the problem still remains problematic.
> No, it does not. Under the standard definitions, the zero ring is not a > counterexample because either (i) it does contain an identity; or (ii) > it is not considered a ring by those that require 1=/=0.
Rant and rave, depraved unto grave, while the trivial becomes dead prey, the original problem still rings, with no one dinging a ping nor daring a fling.
|
|