Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Godel cant tell us what makes a maths statement true-thus his theorem
is meaningless

Replies: 1   Last Post: Feb 6, 2013 6:44 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
byron

Posts: 865
Registered: 3/3/09
Godel cant tell us what makes a maths statement true-thus his theorem
is meaningless

Posted: Feb 4, 2013 12:09 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Australias leading erotic poet colin leslie dean show Godels theorem is meaningless as he cannot tell us what makes a math statement true

http://www.scribd.com/doc/32970323/Godels-incompleteness-theorem-invalid-illegitimate


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#Fir

"Gödel's first incompleteness theorem, perhaps the single most celebrated result in mathematical logic, states that:

For any consistent formal, recursively enumerable theory that proves
basic arithmetical truths, an arithmetical statement that is true, but not provable in the theory, can be constructed.1 That is, any effectively
generated theory capable of expressing elementary arithmetic cannot be
both consistent and complete. "


you see godel referes to true statement
but Godel cant tell us what makes a maths statement true

peter smith the Cambridge expert on Godel admitts Gödel didn't rely on the notion of truth


http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_thread/thread/ebde70bc932fc0a7/de566912ee69f0a8?lnk=gst&q=G%C3%B6del+didn%27t+rely+on+the+notion+PETER+smith#de566912ee69f0a8

Quote:
Gödel didn't rely on the notion
of truth


now because Gödel didn't rely on the notion
of truth he cant tell us whatmakes a maths statements true
thus his theorem is meaningless

it is like me saying there are gibbly statements which cant be proven but not being able to tell you what gibbly statements are, then you all would say my theorem is meaningless



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.