The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: What is the modern way of proving E=MC^2 using SR?
Replies: 3   Last Post: Feb 6, 2013 4:50 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Brian Q. Hutchings

Posts: 6,427
Registered: 12/6/04
Re: What is the modern way of proving E=MC^2 using SR?
Posted: Feb 6, 2013 4:50 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

it is a very simple emendation of Liebniz et al's
*vis viva*, mvv/2 = kinetic energy,
wherein "E" has no potential energy, because
light is waves in hte medium of space,
index of refraction not equal to "one, God-am it."

also, eminently picturable by nonlightconeheads.

> > **  E = M c^2

> watervapor does have, and it IS main GH gas.
> But it mostly have absorption bends in areas
> far from IR emission maximum.

if Tierra del Feguans are not out getting their first tan
of the season, all dressed-up in furs, why aren't they?

this is the second-most awful malaproposisme,
after "global" warming; "hole(s)" in the ozonosphere,
plainly be folks who are not cognizant
of the anticyclonic winter/night thingy.
> about uv induced tumors

according to my (Westinguouse Research) source,
dihydrogen oxide has a much larger window
of absoprtive spectrum, then you-know-what.

restraining order on the googoplex ;
I suggest that you try it, yourself, every candy-colored moon or so.

"global" warming is a horrible malaproposime,
totally confounded by the most elementray datum. and,
the datum of concern hereinatsville is significant
in its own wright, no matter what the God-am Peanut Gallery has
to type about it ... especially Snoopy.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.