|
|
careful on the AP Coordinate System, so not to lose function #1204
New Physics #1324 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Feb 6, 2013 2:10 AM
|
|
I had better watch myself and be more careful in explaining the AP
Coordinate System. I said that a point has two sides, one side a
positive and the other the negative. But I lose function if I define
it that way, since a function can only have one y value for a given x
value. If the same point has a positive and negative value, for
example the point 3.1 would have +3.1 and -3.1 simultaneously and thus
no unique y value for a given x value. So I have to be careful there.
The way I defined it some years back, was that I said the point 3.1
was itself the point and the -3.1 rested behind +3.1, but both are
distinct points. I could do this and get away with it because in AP-
Reals there is the infinity number 10^603 and so every number has a
empty space of 10^-603 from its predecessor and successor. So that
there are holes of 10^-603 between every positive number, and I would
fill or insert a negative number in between two successive positive
numbers.
So in AP-Reals the first number starting with 0 is 0 and the second
number is 1*10^-603 and the next number is 2*10^-603 and the next is
3*10^-603. So in AP Coordinate system I fill each hole with the
negative number as such:
0, -1*10^-603, 1*10^-603, -2*10^-603, 2*10^-603, onwards to 10^603
So now, I cannot be accused of losing function.
The aim of the AP system is to make negative numbers reside next to
their positive number counterparts, so that -4.5 is nearby to +4.5
rather than herding all the negatives and throwing them into a realm
far removed from positive numbers. I want to make the Coordinate
System in much the same way that protons and electrons make up the
Universe, in that they are nearby together so that the Universe is
vastly of 0 charge. Our Universe is not where all the electron lie
opposite all the protons and both separated. Our Universe is where
positive and negative lie close together and thus mathematics
coordinate system should mirror that aspect for a different coordinate
system than the Cartesian.
Now I am not throwing out the Cartesian, but only emphasizing that a
viable alternative coordinate system exists.
--
Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-
bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and
fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
|
