In article <email@example.com>, WM <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: >On 8 Feb., 18:14, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> On 2/8/2013 2:41 AM, WM wrote:
>> > Standard terminology is that X is countable iff X is listable. >> >> Please cite a source for "listable" > >A set is listable means, that it can be written as a sequence (with no >repeating terms - but that is not important). Listable is identical >with countable.
You appear to be unable to cite a source for this usage, which leads observers to believe that it is not standard terminology. After all, if it was standard terminology instead of your private language, your response to a request for a source would be to provide one, not to restate your private definition in a different fashion.
-- Michael F. Stemper #include <Standard_Disclaimer> If it's "tourist season", where do I get my license?