Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Re: ANN_Error Goal
Posted:
Feb 10, 2013 2:05 PM
|
|
Subject: ANN_Error Goal
From: Suresh
Date: 10 Feb, 2013 13:34:09
"Suresh" wrote in message <kf87kh$dta$1@newscl01ah.mathworks.com>...
> Dear Greg,
> As you told I am following these steps to estimate Error goal for an example set.
> >[I N]=size(Input);[13x178]
> >[O N]=size(Target);[3x178]
> From the size of above matrices
> >I = 13 ; O = 3 ;N = 178 ; H =10
Did H=10 come out of midair?
If you do not use validation stopping or regularization,
(e.g.,msereg) Neq > Nw is required. This results in the
upper bound
Hub = -1 + ceil( (Neq-O)/(I+O+1)) = 31
To mitigate measurement error and noise, Neq >> Nw
is desired. A reasonable first try in a search for a practical
value is
H ~ round(Hub/10) = 3
Design Ntrials ~ 10 random initial weight designs. If unsuccessfull,
increase H. However I would not exceed ~ Hub/2 ~ 15 unless using
valstopping or regularization.
If you use valstopping or regularization, you can even use
H > Hub. However, I find those values esthetically displeasing.
> > Nw = (I+1)*H+(H+1)*O = (13+1)*10 + (10+1)*3 = 173
> > Neq = N*O = 178*3 = 534 % Is this correct ?
> > Ndof = Neq-Nw = 534-173 = 361
> > MSE00a = mean(var(Target')) = 0.2207
> MSEgoal=0.01*361*0.2207/534 = 0.0015;
> Is this procedure correct.
The procedure I would use is described above. However, if you
use valstopping or regularization, H = 10 will probably not be
too large.
When you finish let us know your values for H and R2a.
Hope this helps.
Greg
PS I have seen people use BOTH valstopping AND regularization.
... Whatever floats your boat!
|
|
|
|
