On the horizontal axis we have electron kinetic energy (MeV) and on the vertical axis we have relative number of electrons. The maximum KE is 0.782 MeV. Now, the fact that we have electrons with the full 0.782 MeV and no energy for the new particle, but that we require the new particle in order to save conservation of spin and other conservation laws, indicates to us, that the new particle must be part of Space itself-- the magnetic monopole.
When this new particle does have energy, some of the KE of 0.782 MeV, we have to ask what form of wave it must have? It can be two forms, either it is a transverse wave or a longitudinal wave. If it is a transverse wave, its spin is 1 or 0. If it is a longitudinal wave, its spin is either plus or minus 1/2.
I am sorry that I never payed attention to that historic Pauli graphing of the neutron decay of 1930 with its violation of conservation laws, until now. I guess when we pay attention to detail is only when we are in active pursuit of something, and I am in active pursuit of the neutrino as magnetic monopoles of a longitudinal wave.
I am not sure, but, is this the only graph in physics of number of particles versus KE energy that is of this type of graph?
Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine- bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here: