|
|
Re: Matheology § 210
Posted:
Feb 12, 2013 1:12 PM
|
|
WM wrote:
> On 12 Feb., 08:04, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:
>> WM wrote:
>> > On 10 Feb., 23:17, Ralf Bader <ba...@nefkom.net> wrote:
>>
>> >> > But it is interesting (and typical) that you try to distract the
>> >> > reader from the obvious actions ad hominem.
>>
>> >> Ad hominem or ad IP-address? This is another example where also
>> >> absolute non-mathematicians can see how you mix everything up until no
>> >> traits of reason are left.
>>
>> > Dear you are really more stupid than anybody else that I know of. Of
>> > course they acted ad hominem in MO, because the question and the IP
>> > address of Hans enjoyed undisturbed existence for nearly one year.
>> > Only when I disclosed that Hans was me, the question was immediately
>> > closed.
>>
>> Blablablabla. Ask your nanny what a rhetorical question is.
>
> A rhetorical question? Is that a question which shows that the
> questioner is an imbecile?
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/youare
Hahahahaha. Each little child knows its nanny. You are too stupid even for
this.
|
|
