Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
Replies: 1   Last Post: Feb 8, 2013 6:32 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View  
Alan Smaill

Posts: 748
Registered: 1/29/05
Re: Matheology § 222 Back to the roots
Posted: Feb 8, 2013 6:32 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

William Hughes <wpihughes@gmail.com> writes:

> On Feb 7, 8:17 pm, WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote:
>

>> >  You also
>> > show by induction that the antidiagonal of
>> > a list is not in the list.

>>
>> No

>
> You contain multitudes


WM contradicts himself?
Very well, he contradicts himself.

He is small.

--
Alan Smaill



Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.