Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



What's wrong with physics, why bother with URMT?
Posted:
Feb 10, 2013 6:29 AM


With the imminent release of the third book
Unity Root Matrix Theory Mathematical and Physical Advances Volume I
http://www.urmt.org
which puts some physical teeth to the mathematics, it is time to explain how and why I think we need a discrete formulation of Physics: This is a start...
http://www.urmt.org/urmt_why_bother.html
Front cover with explanation:
http://www.urmt.org/urmt_mapa_fcv_web.pdf
About the third book...
This third book in the series on Unity Root Matrix Theory (URMT) advances the subject into mainstream physics by detailing how it relates to such topics as the classical harmonic oscillator, The Special Theory of Relativity and some related cosmology
The book starts by extending URMT's mathematical methods to handle arbitrary real and complex vectors, and then proceeds to show how oscillators and Special Relativity can be formulated in the language of URMT. Among the results is the embodiment of Einstein's relativistic energymomentum equation in a 5D formulation, with mass emergent from a scalar potential. There are also some cosmological implications stemming from a relativistic Doppler solution, notably the Hubble expansion law  all quite an achievement given URMT's origins in number theory and Diophantine equations. Additionally, using URMT's unique variational methods, a 4D formulation naturally produces a quadratic, harmonic potential, with a consequent solution for the harmonic oscillator. Other topics include Lorentz transformations and some mechanics. The book finishes by showing how these real and complex formulations can be recast in integers, i.e. a return to URMT's integer foundations.
Enjoy
Richard Miller, see web for email.



