The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: What's wrong with physics, why bother with URMT?
Replies: 2   Last Post: Feb 10, 2013 3:17 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
richard miller

Posts: 170
Registered: 9/29/06
What's wrong with physics, why bother with URMT?
Posted: Feb 10, 2013 6:29 AM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

With the imminent release of the third book

Unity Root Matrix Theory
Mathematical and Physical Advances Volume I

which puts some physical teeth to the mathematics, it is time to
explain how and why I think we need a discrete formulation of Physics:
This is a start...

Front cover with explanation:

About the third book...

This third book in the series on Unity Root Matrix Theory (URMT)
advances the subject into mainstream physics by detailing how it
relates to such topics as the classical harmonic oscillator, The
Special Theory of Relativity and some related cosmology

The book starts by extending URMT's mathematical methods to handle
arbitrary real and complex vectors, and then proceeds to show how
oscillators and Special Relativity can be formulated in the language
of URMT. Among the results is the embodiment of Einstein's
relativistic energy-momentum equation in a 5D formulation, with mass
emergent from a scalar potential. There are also some cosmological
implications stemming from a relativistic Doppler solution, notably
the Hubble expansion law - all quite an achievement given URMT's
origins in number theory and Diophantine equations. Additionally,
using URMT's unique variational methods, a 4D formulation naturally
produces a quadratic, harmonic potential, with a consequent solution
for the harmonic oscillator. Other topics include Lorentz
transformations and some mechanics. The book finishes by showing how
these real and complex formulations can be recast in integers, i.e. a
return to URMT's integer foundations.


Richard Miller, see web for email.

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.