On 11 Feb, 23:17, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > In article > <6cb6128e-e235-4345-9aaf-6fb6dd6ba...@g8g2000vbf.googlegroups.com>, > > > > > > > > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 11 Feb, 09:00, Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com> wrote: > > > In article > > > <03a59b13-1fbd-4098-91d7-f093d7cf5...@w4g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>, > > > > JT <jonas.thornv...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Wikipedia claims that 1/2 decimal 0,5 is 0,1 in ternary... and also > > > > 0,1 in binary..... > > > > > In reality it is 0.12 in ternary and 0.101 in binary > > > > Shouldn't 0.12 in base three be the same as > > > 1/3 + 2/3^2 = 3/9 + 2/9 = 5/9? > > > > I make one-half expressed in base 3 to be 0.1111... > > > -- > > >http://www.anybase.co.nf/ > > If that says otherwise, it is wrong! > --
No my algorithm write bases in finite way, the correct way to write numbers in bases, and it is generic work for any base. How the multiples really work is easy for anyone with a brain to understand, but first one have to understand what a fraction and a whole number is. And neither exist upon your numberline.