Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Chapt15.43 Deriving Strong Nuclear force and Gravity force purely
from Maxwell Equations #1219 New Physics #1339 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Feb 11, 2013 4:13 PM
|
|
Chapt15.43 Deriving Strong Nuclear force and Gravity force purely from
Maxwell Equations
Now what I am doing here is getting towards Radioactivity derived by
the Maxwell Equations. I need that because recently I learned that
neutron decay is basically the far larger picture of Beta decay rather
than the isolated picture of a free neutron in decay.
So I want to briefly review how the Maxwell Equations derive the
Strong Nuclear force, the force of gravity and finally derive Weak
Nuclear so that I can focus in on neutron decay either as a free
neutron or a neutron packed in a nucleus and we notice it as Beta
decay.
So I am just briefly summarizing Strong Nuclear and gravity. Strong
Nuclear is when the electron and proton inside a neutron spills out
and over the neutron and this nuclear electron goes around holding
together all the protons of the nucleus, much like a chemical bond of
a hydrogen atom with a second hydrogen atom of its H2 chemical bond.
So we simply replace neutrons with nuclear electron + proton so in the
case of helium we have 2 protons and 2 neutrons but in the Maxwell
derivation we have 2 nuclear-electrons with 4 protons so each nuclear
electron is holding together 2 protons. It is a nuclear-chemical bond
for it involves nuclear electrons. Nuclear-electrons are different
from orbital electrons because they are so close to the protons. So
the Maxwell Equations derives the Strong Nuclear force as a nuclear
chemical bond.
The force of gravity is derived from the Maxwell Equations as the
smallest residual electric charge of bodies. Let me explain smallest
residual electric charge. A body such as Earth is basically overall
neutral in charge to a vast extent. However, close up to Earth, there
are charges that are not neutralized. There are magnets all over Earth
and especially the magnetosphere of Earth. There are charges in
lightening bolt flashes. There are charges due to the inner core of
Earth as a dynamo. So, overall if we get far away from Earth we can
generally say all the charges cancel out and that Earth is
electrically neutral at a far distance, but if we get closer to Earth
and ever closer to all what is going on, we see no overall neutrality
of charge but see many instances of electricity and magnetism in
action and motion. The same is said of the Sun and other planets. The
overall charge imbalance is tiny but is not neutral. And the force of
gravity compared to electromagnetism is 10^40 weaker as a force, so it
takes very little imbalance of charge to make Earth revolve around the
Sun, where the Sun is a far larger imbalanced electricity and
magnetism.
Now in some cases, the imbalance is far larger than random imbalance
of charges, in some cases, like the Rings of Saturn have a uniform
imbalance of the polar molecules of ice that form the Rings and this
more uniform imbalance leads to Solid Body Rotation, rather than the
more scattered rotation of planets in orbit around the Sun. Gravity
involves mass, for mass is built up of particles of charge, but the
pull of gravity is the force of electromagnetism. Gravity as a pure
pull of mass for another mass cannot account for Solid Body Rotation,
for it is far too weak to allow Solid Body Rotation. Gravity must be
EM force, where the smallest imbalance of electromagnetism shows up in
the pull of gravity.
Now I am doing these summarizations because I need to get to
radioactivity and explain how the neutrino is a longitudinal wave of
magnetic monopoles.
--
Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-
bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and
fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
|
|
|
