Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
showing how the Maxwell Equations explains all forms of Radioactivity
#1222 New Physics #1342 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Feb 12, 2013 3:17 AM
|
|
Now earlier today I spoke of where Beta decay is likely to be best
described as Faraday's law, and where I needed two items out of the
Maxwell Equations, that neutrinos exist as magnetic monopoles and that
neutrinos are longitudinal waves of these magnetic monopoles.
Now I maybe wrong that the Ampere law and the displacement current
maybe the law that describes Beta decay of a neutron in the nucleus.
But let me just fast forward to the picture of Beta decay.
This much I am positively sure of, in that, as the Symmetrical Maxwell
Equations are the axiom set over all of physics, means that those
equations must explain every radioactivity event that happens.
So as we can demonstrate the 4 Maxwell Equations in a laboratory with
equipment, we can also explain the radioactivity of a Beta decay of a
neutron in a given atom by those 4 Maxwell Equations.
So let me give it a shot here as to perhaps what is going on in Beta
decay of a neutron going into a proton with a neutrino and electron
emitted. And almost the same explanation for a free neutron in decay.
Picture the neutron as composed of three items, the proton, electron
and neutrino (or antineutrino). Picture Faraday's law as a closed loop
wire as the proton and electron, and the bar magnet as a neutrino. The
neutrino is a group of magnetic monopoles (perhaps 137 magnetic
monopoles or
140/2). So the neutrino is a bar magnet of numerous magnetic monopoles
and it is moving into a closed loop of the proton and electron. Since
it is moving into that loop, it causes a motion of the proton and
especially the electron. If the motion of the neutrino is great enough
of a thrust, it causes the electron to come ripping outside of that
neutron shell it resided in. And thus we see a Beta minus decay. Now
if the motion of the neutrino is so large, we see both the neutrino
and the electron come zooming out of that neutron.
Now, let me try to describe a neutrino as a magnetic monopole bar
magnet. It is a longitudinal wave, and so it is a compression and a
rarefaction. So we have a M+ alongside a M- and then another M+ then
M-
alternating.
Now Space itself is this alternation of M+ and M- magnetic monopoles
for we have zillions of neutrinos packed within a cubic centimeter of
Space.
So here I am saying that Space is magnetic monopoles, and when a
neutrino comes out of a Beta decay, the neutrino travels at the speed
of light and those monopoles add to the points of Space.
Now in physics we had a long history of looking for the Aether of
Space for light waves to travel in or on.
So if Space is the same as the density of magnetic monopoles (the
density of free roaming neutrinos), then the Aether is magnetic
monopoles.
Now in that decay picture, it is hard to imagine a closed loop wire of
just a proton and electron, but if you consider there is Space for the
proton and electron to reside inside the neutron, that there are
magnetic monopoles. So that when the neutrino bar magnet thrusts
through inside the neutron, it is thrusting through a loop formed of
magnetic monopoles.
Now I imagine the Faraday law is better equipped to explain Beta decay
than is the Ampere law with displacement current. And in the Faraday
law we have the displacement magnetism, the magnetic current density
term, which in my above explanation forms that closed loop wire for
the single proton and single electron to travel upon.
--
Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-
bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and
fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
|
|
|
