Quarks seem to essentially derive from infrared... What is essentially quark theory is that it takes four quarks to pin down a grey wormhole in the 'down' orientation... 'k, well, what if a wormhole turns into the 'back' orientation? Well, that can't happen because then there would have to be a seventh quark for the sake of left and right. So who wants to argue since everyone who does quarks is in a game of oneupmanship to prove who is a more sadistic sadist?
It might be the case that Fermilab can handle double torroidals but there seems to be competing interests for the funtion that double torroidals might fill. (shrug)