Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum


Math Forum
 Ask Dr. Math
 Discussions
 Internet Newsletter
 MathTools
 Problems of the Week
 Teacher2Teacher
 Teacher Exchange
 Workshops

Search All of the Math Forum:
Browse our Internet Mathematics Library

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Quark Theory
Replies: 0  

Advanced Search
Reply to this Topic Reply to this Topic

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List  
Kevin

Posts: 484
Registered: 5/1/10
Quark Theory
Posted: Feb 12, 2013 7:52 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Quarks seem to essentially derive from infrared... What is essentially
quark theory is that it takes four quarks to pin down a grey wormhole
in the 'down' orientation... 'k, well, what if a wormhole turns into
the 'back' orientation? Well, that can't happen because then there
would have to be a seventh quark for the sake of left and right. So
who wants to argue since everyone who does quarks is in a game of
oneupmanship to prove who is a more sadistic sadist?

It might be the case that Fermilab can handle double torroidals but
there seems to be competing interests for the funtion that double
torroidals might fill. (shrug)

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2013. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.