Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
Posts:
796
Registered:
9/1/10
|
|
Re: Euler's Equation and the Reality of Nature.
Posted:
Feb 17, 2013 10:04 AM
|
|
On Wednesday, February 13, 2013 11:51:32 PM UTC-8, sadovnik socratus wrote:
> Euler's Equation and the Reality of Nature.
>
> =.
>
> Mr. Dexter Sinister wrote:
>
> ? I understand Euler's Identity,
>
> and I know what it means, and I know how to prove it,
>
> there's nothing particularly mystical about it,
>
> it just demonstrates that exponential, trigonometric,
>
> and complex functions are related.
>
> Given what we know of mathematics it shouldn't surprise
>
> anyone that its various bits are connected.
>
> It would be much more surprising if they weren't, that would
>
> almost certainly mean something was badly wrong somewhere.?
>
>
>
> Mr. Gary wrote:
>
> Mathematics is NOT science.
>
> Science is knowledge of the REAL world.
>
> Mathematics is an invention of the mind.
>
> Many aspects of mathematics have found application
>
> in the real world, but there is no guarantee.
>
> Any correlation must meet the ultimate test:
>
> does it explain something about the real world?
>
> As an electrical engineer I used the generalized
>
> Euler's equation all the time in circuit analysis:
>
>
>
> exp(j*theta) = cos(theta) + j*sin(theta).
>
>
>
> So it works at that particular level in electricity.
>
> Does it work at other levels, too?
>
> Logic cannot prove it.
>
> It must be determined by experiment, not by philosophizing.
>
> ====..
>
> Thinking about theirs posts I wrote brief article:
>
> Euler's Equation and Reality.
>
> =.
>
> a)
>
> Euler's Equation as a mathematical reality.
>
> Euler's identity is "the gold standard for mathematical beauty'.
>
> Euler's identity is "the most famous formula in all mathematics".
>
> ? . . . this equation is the mathematical analogue of Leonardo
>
> da Vinci?s Mona Lisa painting or Michelangelo?s statue of David?
>
> ?It is God?s equation.?, ? It is a mathematical icon.?
>
> . . . . etc.
>
> b)
>
> Euler's Equation as a physical reality.
>
> "it is absolutely paradoxical; we cannot understand it,
>
> and we don't know what it means, . . . . .?
>
> ? Euler's Equation reaches down into the very depths of existence?
>
> ? Is Euler's Equation about fundamental matters??
>
> ?It would be nice to understand Euler's Identity as a physical process
>
> using physics.?
>
> ? Is it possible to unite Euler's Identity with physics, quantum
>
> physics ??
>
> ==.
>
> My aim is to understand the reality of nature.
>
> Can Euler's equation explain me something about reality?
>
> To give the answer to this question I need to bind
>
> Euler's equation with an object - particle.
>
> Can it be math- point or string- particle or triangle-particle?
>
> No, Euler's formula has quantity (pi) which says me that
>
> the particle must be only a circle .
>
> Now I want to understand the behavior of circle - particle and
>
> therefore I need to use spatial relativity and quantum theories.
>
> These two theories say me that the reason of circle ? particle?s
>
> movement is its own inner impulse (h) or (h*=h/2pi).
>
> a)
>
> Using its own inner impulse (h) circle - particle moves
>
> ( as a wheel) in a straight line with constant speed c = 1.
>
> We call such particle - ?photon?.
>
> From Earth ? gravity point of view this speed is maximally.
>
> From Vacuum point of view this speed is minimally.
>
> In this movement quantum of light behave as a corpuscular (no charge).
>
> b)
>
> Using its own inner impulse / intrinsic angular momentum
>
> ( h* = h / 2pi ) circle - particle rotates around its axis.
>
> In such movement particle has charge, produce electric waves
>
> ( waves property of particle) and its speed ( frequency) is : c>1.
>
> We call such particle - ? electron? and its energy is: E=h*f.
>
>
>
> In this way I (as a peasant ) can understand the reality of nature.
>
> ==.
>
> I reread my post.
>
> My God, that is a naïve peasant's explanation.
>
> It is absolutely not scientific, not professor's explanation.
>
> Would a learned man adopt such simple and naive explanation?
>
> Hmm, . . . problem.
>
> In any way, even Mr. Dexter Sinister and Mr. Gary
>
> wouldn't agree with me, I want to say them
>
> ' Thank you for emails and cooperation?
>
> =.
>
> Best wishes.
>
> Israel Sadovnik Socratus.
>
> =.
>
> P.S.
>
> ' They would play a greater and greater role in mathematics ?
>
> and then, with the advent of quantum mechanics in the twentieth
>
> century, in physics and engineering and any field that deals with
>
> cyclical phenomena such as waves that can be represented by
>
> complex numbers. For a complex number allows you to represent
>
> two processes such as phase and wavelenght simultaneously ?
>
> and a complex exponential allows you to map a straight line
>
> onto a circle in a complex plane.'
>
>
>
> / Book: The great equations. Chapter four.
>
> The gold standard for mathematical beauty.
>
> Euler?s equation. Page 104. /
>
>
>
> #
>
> Euler's e-iPi+1=0 is an amazing equation, not in-and-of itself,
>
> but because it sharply points to our utter ignorance of the
>
> simplest mathematical and scientific fundamentals.
>
> The equation means that in flat Euclidean space, e and Pi happen
>
> to have their particular values to satisfy any equation that relates
>
> their mathematical constructs. In curved space, e and Pi vary.
>
> / Rasulkhozha S. Sharafiddinov . /
>
> ===============?
musa tov
|
|
|
|
