The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Topic: Chapt15.45 Deriving all of biology from the Maxwell Equations as
axiom set #1231 New Physics #1351 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Replies: 2   Last Post: Feb 18, 2013 12:48 AM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]

Posts: 14,697
Registered: 3/31/08
Chapt15.45 Deriving all of biology from the Maxwell Equations as
axiom set #1231 New Physics #1351 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Posted: Feb 15, 2013 4:39 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

Chapt15.45 Deriving all of biology from the Maxwell Equations as axiom

Alright, I best or better start this book on "Biology with the Maxwell
Equations as axiom set". If I have enough time in life, I will do this
textbook separately. Of course, the 5th axiom is all the facts of
chemistry. Just the same as physics, which needs 5 axioms in full. You
see, the Maxwell Equations need something to work with, and those
things are all the facts of chemistry, and the Maxwell Equations tell
us how chemistry interacts.

Now the Maxwell Equations were never really introduced into biology
for the history of biology, and there is a good reason for this. It
involves the history of physics also. The reason physics had Quantum
Mechanics is because there really was no top notch physicist in the
time period of 1860 to 2012 except for Dirac, but Dirac was too busy
to focus on the Maxwell Equations. The rest of the physicists in that
time period were too weak in logic and mind to put the Maxwell
Equations as the center of physics. So weak in mind that they threw
out the Equations and said they were as flawed as the Newton laws of
motion and then the 20th century fondled silly and stupid theories of
Quantum Mechanics and Relativity when both of them were mere subsets
of the Maxwell Equations. So the reason that physics did not have the
Maxwell Equations as the center of physics is because the physicists
were too weak in mind and illogical in thoughts.

Now the reason biology never used the Maxwell Equations as the axiom
set over all of biology is about the same reason the physicists were
too dumb to do it. Biologists, for the most part are not good enough
to be physicists because all that math scares them and they end up
majoring in biology. Rarely do you find a biologist fluent in the
Maxwell Equations. By fluent I mean not mastering but rather like most
Phd in physics, having a rote memorization of the Maxwell Equations.

To be a master of the Maxwell Equations is to be able to derive them
by yourself without ever having heard of them or learned them in
school. I myself am not a master in the Equations, rather, I am a
master of logic. I am one of the world's few masters of science logic,
and others were Archimedes of Greek times, Newton, Galileo, Faraday,

So why have no biologists ever started down this road of making
biology a axiom set of the Maxwell Equations, and the answer is
obvious that not even the physicists of 1860 to 2012 were smart enough
to do that to physics, so certainly no-one in biology is bright enough
to begin the program.

So let me start the program.

If you look at all living organisms, the first question is what is
their geometry? Is it hyperbolic, elliptic or Euclidean? Keep in mind
that hyperbolic is a closed loop wire or a funnel shape biology. A
human is a torus, which is a funnel shape. I am not certain for I have
not researched viruses, but I believe all organisms including viruses
have an intake out outtake which in mathematics topology means a
"hole" or torus shape. Humans have a mouth which is a long funnel or
tube that goes to the exterior for waste products. Now the human body
has more funnels, such as the heart and circulatory system, etc.

The funnel or torus or closed loop is the electron and is the closed
loop wire in Faraday's law. The bar magnet in Faraday's law is the
proton or battery, or in animals is the food intake or in plants is
the sunlight striking their leaves. In plants, they also are built
like a long funnel, a long coiled wire loop. Here is an excerpt from
Wikipedia on photosynthesis:

--- quoting in parts from Wikipedia on photosynthesis ---
Although photosynthesis can happen in different ways in different
species, some features are always the same. For example, the process
always begins when energy from light is absorbed by proteins called
photosynthetic reaction centers that contain chlorophylls. In plants,
these proteins are held inside organelles called chloroplasts, while
in bacteria they are embedded in the plasma membrane. Some of the
light energy gathered by chlorophylls is stored in the form of
adenosine triphosphate (ATP). The rest of the energy is used to remove
electrons from a substance such as water. These electrons are then
used in the reactions that turn carbon dioxide into organic compounds.
In plants, algae and cyanobacteria, this is done by a sequence of
reactions called the Calvin cycle, but different sets of reactions are
found in some bacteria, such as the reverse Krebs cycle in Chlorobium.
Many photosynthetic organisms have adaptations that concentrate or
store carbon dioxide. This helps reduce a wasteful process called
photorespiration that can consume part of the sugar produced during

6CO2 + 6H2O + light energy ==> C6H12O6 + 6O2

--- end quote ---

So here is the message in this post. That all living organisms are
hyperbolic geometry entities because they are the closed loop wire in
Faraday's law, and the bar magnet for animals is food and for plants
is sunlight. The organism lives because of the electricity and
magnetism that it takes in and stores. There is even perpetual motion
of electrons in circuits of the body of the living creature and only
upon death is that electrical system completely stopped.


Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-
bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and
fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:

Archimedes Plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2017. All Rights Reserved.