Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



Re: The most fundamental physics equation
Posted:
Feb 17, 2013 6:12 AM


On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:13:37, "Tom Potter" <tdp1001@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 1. The most fundamental physical property is angular displacement. > > 2. Quantum changes occur when systems exchange angular displacement. > > ( You can add or take away cycles from a pendulum > or oscillating system. ) > > 3. The most fundamental quanta of change is best modeled by "i' > ( The square root of minus one. ) > > 4. i^1 = a quarter cycle counterclockwise angular displacement > i^2 = a half cycle counterclockwise angular displacement > i^4 = one cycle counterclockwise angular displacement > i^n = n quarter cycles counterclockwise angular displacement > i^4n = n cycles counterclockwise angular displacement > > 5. Changes occur in quanta of i^n > http://www.microwaves101.com/Encyclopedia/quarterwave.cfm > > http://www.microwaves101.com/ENCYCLOPEDIA/smithchart.cfm > > 6. The quanta units of angular displacement include: > a. cycles = i^n/4 > b. half cycles ( cycles * 2 ) > c. Quarter cycles ( cycles * 4) > > 7. The real number units of angular displacement include: > a. radians = ( 2 * pi * cycles ) > ( Which is an angular displacement referenced to a space unit.) > b. action = Planck's Constant * i^n/4 > ( Which is an angular displacement referenced to an energy unit.) > > 8. Angular displacements are measured using > an external standard frequency source. > > Since 1967, the International System of Units (SI) has defined > the second as the duration of 9192631770 cycles of radiation > corresponding to the transition between two energy levels of the caesium133 > atom. > > In other words, although i^n is the most fundamental quanta of change, > in order to measure it, > it must be referenced to an external source, > and at the present time, > that reference is an energy level transition of the caesium133 atom. > > 9. The Potter Equation is the most fundamental physics equation. > x = e^(i^n * m*pi) = e^((i^n)^2 * k) > > It expands the "Euler Identity" equation (e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0) > http://www.songho.ca/math/euler/euler.html > > and relates pure math to physical reality. > > ( Note that "m" and the "k" > interface quanta angular displacements to a linear space. > 2*pi*r, pi*d, k = pi*n*r ) > > The Potter Equation which features quanta of angular displacement > > is more fundamental than e = hf > ( Which features Planck's quanta of action.) > > and is more fundamental than e = mc^2 > ( Which features Einstein's non existent quanta of energy.) > > 10. Change is conveyed from sources to sinks in quanta of i^n, > ( Quarter wave quanta ) > > Planck's Constant is a constant > used to convert angular displacement quanta to action. > ( i^n * h = action ) > > And Einstein's quanta of energy is action quanta "h" affected by velocity. > ( energy = hf and relative motion affects f.) > > 11. Several other constants come into play > when equating measurements based on > either cycles (Quanta) or radians (Real) to reality > > Cycles are bosons and many bosons can occupy a point. > > ( You can add or take away cycles from a pendulum > or oscillating system. ) > > The measured value of a batch of bosons > depends upon how the measurement is made > and expressed: > > peak > peak to peak > average > rms, > quasipeak > etc. > > Observe that peak and peak to peak > quantize a batch of bosons at a point in time > whereas quasipeak, average and RMS > quantize the batch over some time period. > > 11. Quanta of angular displacement tend to > migrate from high temperature systems > to contiguous lower temperature systems. > > For more information visit my physics web site. > http://184.105.237.216/~tompotte/menu.html > > I think this post is bulletproof > and like to see anyone shoot a hole in it. > > I welcome feedback, comments, criticism, > and even sharpshooting. > > (A 'sharpshooter' criticizes without offering suggestions.) >
Very good mathematics, but nothing to bring home the bacon. Sorry just a engineering viepoint. will
Ps, I still think Erwin's stuff is more fundimental. If you want to do the math, fourspace is inadequate. Try thinking in octonions! (just a suggestion)



