Alright I have 60 pages to go before I automatically stop writing New Physics and continue with just the Atom Totality text. However I may stop before reaching 1300 pages of New Physics, as I am slowly blending into Atom Totality theory. And this post is one of those blending into the theory.
In astronomy we witness two facts that are difficult to explain and Old Physics does a horrible job with them. These two facts are pulsars and quasars. Now Old Physics had no axiom system to keep them honest with logic and where any crank or crackpot of physics could insert their own stupid explanation because no axiom system would contradict them. And so when something like pulsars or quasars come to be factually seen, then those cranks and crackpots fill up the explanation with silly things that would contradict the Maxwell Equations. They do not care so long as their crackpot explanations theory fills the literature and textbooks and pollutes the minds of students.
So let me take a few minutes here and start a reasonable explanation of both pulsars and quasars when we put them to a Maxwell Equations test. Let us put pulsars and quasars to a Maxwell Equations preliminary test and see if we can get a reasonable explanation, rather than the far flung explanation by a nattering-nutter who has no axiom system to guide him, just his greed for fame.
Now I remember vacationing out West in USA, driving from Ohio to the Western Parks of the USA with my father and others when I was a teenager. And we camped in the National Parks. It was a lot of fun, and I remember also a favorite radio station in the late 1960s of Oklahoma City that played a lot of rock and roll songs at that time. But I remember trying to tune to the station far away in another state and there was static. But listening closely to the static I recall a pulse in the static. Funny how I remember that. I remembered it because later in life when on a Caribbean Island and tuning into the BBC for the news, I would also listen to the static and hear a pulse. Now, I am sure others have listened to the radio and heard their own pulses.
But the main message here is, we have the Maxwell Equations as axioms and we have pulsars in Space as radio pulses by some astro body far away from Earth. Our job here is not to dream up some crazy theory like so many cranks and crackpots that have no axiom system to guide them, but our job is to stay solely confined to the Maxwell Equations as axioms. Is there something in the Maxwell Equations that gives us pulsars that are natural and purely out of the Maxwell Equations? Well, if a distant radio station like the Oklahoma City or BBC can give out pulses in their signal and because of interference with other signals of radio waves that these pulses occur naturally, means that pulsars of astro bodies are just normal radio signals that are too far away and intermediate signals are interfering and causing the more distant ones to pulse. Now we would be terrible silly in thoughts if we thought that Oklahoma City radio tower was spinning around in a circle at a huge speed to produce the pulses. We would be classified as a crackpot to think that the radio pulses were from a spinning platform. We would not be classes a crackpot if we thought the pulses were due to the interference of other radio signals upon the weaker Oklahoma signal.
So I think here, I have a preliminary natural explanation for pulsars as normal radio signals but which have some interference by other signals in the line of sight of origin.
The reader must see that we have to conform everything to the Maxwell Equations and not contradict the equations.
Now moving on to quasars. Recently I bought a cat play toy of a laser light and the cat's love it, for they think it is some mouse. Now when quasars were first discovered in astronomy in the 20th century, in late 1950s, of course the way physics was run in that century was there was no axiom system to keep physicists honest in logic, and it was run purely on high testosterone of those with the biggest mouth and greed for fame. When you have the Maxwell Equations as axioms, we no longer have to put up with obnoxious fame seekers who lack logic to think. We no longer have to put up with crackpots like Hawking or Higgs or Weinberg or Gell-Mann who never had a axiom system to keep them logically sound.
Getting back to quasars.
I have several battery operated lanterns run on 3 AA batteries as well as flashlights run on 3 AA batteries.
Stars are for the most part, say 99.99% of them are lantern type stars. But, could we not configure a star, a natural shining star that its radiation is more like a flashlight beam concentrated or better yet, a laser beam? My cat laser toy, if I recall is 3 AA batteries. I need to examine it, to see if it has a parabolic mirror to focus the light beam. Now I do realize that stars are globe or sphere shaped and that they have no parabolic reflector surrounding them. But can we envision where a star does simulate the laser beam?
Because the laser beam comes from the Maxwell Equations and is not a contradiction of the Maxwell Equations. But junk science or science fiction of black-holes is a violation of the Maxwell Equations.
So, here, today, we have pulsars and quasars and the Maxwell Equations. We cannot violate the equations and so we must find an explanation of pulsars and quasars keeping with the equations.
We do not care about greed fame and limelight and prizes. We care only that we have the Maxwell Equations as axioms never violated and that they will deliver the real truth.
Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine- bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here: