Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
quasars as laser-diode-stars #1242 New Physics #1362 ATOM TOTALITY
5th ed
Posted:
Feb 19, 2013 1:14 AM
|
|
Quasars as laser-stars
Alright, I retrieved my cat toy laser to examine it. And if I were
younger, in my teens or twenties I would more than likely tear it
apart to see the internals of the laser. It is a diode laser and a
nice picture of it is shown in Wikipedia under "laser" and a picture
with caption:
--- quoting Wikipedia on laser diode picture ---
"A 5.6 mm 'closed can' commercial laser diode, probably from a CD or
DVD player. "
--- end quote ---
So what I am thinking is, why can there not be a laser-star?
Apparently all that is needed is a cavity
and some chemistry. If the surface of a star is polluted with atoms or
ions which form a cavity and are sustained as a cavity, then we have
the perfect ingredient of a star becoming a laser-star.
Now in New Physics there is no Doppler shift of light
so the redshift comes from diffraction or some other physical means.
In the case of quasars, it may just be that these stars operate in the
red wavelength because of the laser light is at that wavelength or
frequency. This would mean quasars are not very far away and likely
that our own Milky Way galaxy has plenty of quasars. And finally, no
need to ascribe them as super-energy sources but just normal stars
with a laser diode envelope producing laser light emission. Now, if
this is true, we should be seeing some quasars that have a damaged
envelope of some chemicals that returns the star from being a quasar
to being some ordinary star. If I remember correctly, that many
quasars have turned from being exceptional to being ordinary stars.
Also, some quasars maybe a group of stars at the nucleus of a galaxy
and in that case the envelope would be some dust or other material
shrouding the
nucleus forming a laser diode of the trapped radiation.
Anyway, when you make the Maxwell Equations as the axioms of physics,
they keep every thought and speculation tethered to those 4 equations
and what is allowed by them. Obviously the laser is allowed by the
Maxwell Equations and since stars have the most light of the Universe,
why would we not think that some stars display laser light? So if we
can have lasers in the laboratory, no reason we cannot have stars as
laser light objects like a laser diode star.
--
Google's archives are top-heavy in hate-spew from search-engine-
bombing. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and
fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
|
|
|
