Math Forum Discussions

Kevin

Posts: 480
Registered: 5/1/10

Surviving The Schizo Gauntlet
Posted: Feb 26, 2013 12:42 PM

Plain Text

I made it through the Marine Corp's Schizo gauntlet... I made it
through Academe's Schizo gauntlet... I made it through Psychiatry's
Schizo gauntlet... and it must be true that I made it through the
Jew's Schizo gauntlet because the safe bet argument boils down to that
it must be a 'safe bet' that I'm a 'schizo'...The demented rabbit in
Alice in Wonderland has the right idea... (I'm late, I'm late, for a
very important date... No time to say hello, ***GOODBYE***) You can't
blame me for the 'safe bet' argument. That is what academe believes...
Why does my philosophy teacher present the 'safe bet' argument to his
class now that we all know what it means? (The 'safe bet' is untenable
in a philosophy class unless it is being presented to philosophy
majors, methinks... Sartre isn't presented in an introduction to
philosophy so why the 'safe bet'?) The Marine Corps doesn't actually
make it a high priority to weed out the gun infatuated schizos since a
poor judgement call is bad news for the drill instructors. The drill
instructors try and break the schizos and the schizos break in front
of me instead of the drill instructors. (It couldn't possibly be the
case that I have an aptitude for 'transferance issues' since it is
impossible for anyone to flatter me for my role in psychiatry given
that my expertise in psychiatry is out of dire necessity.) I'm working
at a machine shop in Texas and the Texas lead man goes into fits of
rage right in front of me and everybody else in the shop... So the
Texas lead man is a broken schizo, what happens next? The Texas boss
reasons that since the Texas lead man is really that much more
important than I am, the Texas boss takes his side over mine. Well, it
turns out that 'folding' is objectifiable. Folding is a means for a
self attenuating system to make adjustments on itself... in the
antimatter realm... so the possible relevance of this to me is that...
the math types who do folding are possibly hard nut whackos that I
should be leery of. No matter how leery you might happen to be of
strings, Marine Corps... a testable strings hypothesis would
completely decimate and annihilate quantum physics for all eternity so
if you're wondering why I obsess of other intangible aspects of
physics, it is because I'm twidling my thumbs while a testable strings
hypothesis, which I have no control of, comes to fruition. I can smell
obsession at this point because of Klein bottles. Am I the expert?
Well, since the rule is for me not to apply myself to anything that is
difficult then a banal remark takes precident. Klein bottles intrigue
me only once in a blue moon. (How untenable is it that any Jew is on
any faculty in American academe? If Jews want to be on a faculty in
academe, then what do we have Israel for? How doubly untenable is it
that any Jew has tenure on any faculty in American academe? How triply
untenable is it that I'm in a partnership with a tenured Jew in
American academe?... given that I'm the boss... and the Jew is my
subordinate... nevertheless, I'll go along with the charade since I
need the cash money at the present moment.)

The news media is enigmatic in a sense because, the better you are as
a scientist, the more obvious it is that you don't care for the
limelight... The media is infatuated with it's delusion of being
altruistic but it's not true since being under the media gives me
what... The government is entitled to control the news media after
hostilities have ended between America and another country since how
are diplomatic concerns something the news media needs to have control
of? Britian is sensitive to militaristic cultures and they always
benefit when hostilities have ended between America and another
country. America is a diplomatic vassel of the British. Britian is
always supportive of American diplomacy and therefore, I think I
represent the British sentiment by saying: 'Hilary, it really isn't
your fault.' Barak Obama is an obsession of mine due to the fact that
he must Lord of the Lunatics if he thinks that confidence and false
confidence are the same thing. Barak Obama must have been Nero in a
former life. Barak can't exist since my obsession is to have
absolutely no knowledge of what is inside of his head.

Psychiatry claims that they find it difficult to identify which schizo
is capable of gun violence but the fact of the matter is that no
decent human being cares to involve himself on the topic of
transferance issues. It's a real simple rule, psychiatry. Just ask me
who the schizos are and I'll point them out to you... and the most
obvious schizos of all don't even need my input and that would be
anyone who claims that I'm a schizo.

So I know this guy and I'd estimate his IQ to be around 80... He
claims to be clairvoyant... It seems to be a true representation of
what he believes to be true so why should I have a problem with it? He
is sometimes hostile but does he have just enough on the ball to mock
hostility for the sake of making himself an enigma to me? What he
seems to really want from me is for me to be proud of him since he
believes that he can make someone with an exalted intellect such as
mine... think... and I admit that it is true, someone with an IQ of 80
can make me think... so what is it that I don't think about? I don't
think about the crown that is too heavy for any man to lift... Sounds
like a metaphor for pain... Do I want to know what it means and the
answer is not at all. The notion that my Aunt Ruth carried the crown
that no man can lift is simply a thought that occured to me and I have
no intention of pursuing the depth of it's meaning. The issue is a non-
sequitor... until the gun obsessed schizo comes along and he
apparently wants a chunk of that crown (or maybe he wants the whole
damn pie just for the sake of the asking.) The gun obsessed schizo is
maybe just a teensy bit smarter than the average bear... but his
perspective is that being the boss entitles him to believe that he is
the smartest man who ever lived in the history of mankind and so that
isn't the thing that he is hiding... The thing that he is hiding is
his belief in his own clairvoyance... The consequence of that is that
my Aunt Ruth is a source of pain due to the fact that she is hiding
the same thing. The gun obsessed schizo cannot make me think under any
circumstance whatsoever. The guy with an IQ of 80 can make me think
and my Aunt Ruth can make me think but never the gun obsessed schizo.
I have a fault given that I am in the habit of believing myself to be
indominable. It seems that the Britian's royal family has some odd
ways of dealing with pain (given that I should happen to find myself
married to the lovely and charming Princess Eugenie.) What would be
the big deal of my marrying into the royal family? The question on my
mind is: Since we live in a modern 'scientific' age, what benefit does
the royal family derive from 'science'? If I'm the 'scientific' choice
for marriage into royalty, then I don't see the difficulty. Delusions
of grandeur don't exist in psychiatry anymore since flattery readily
arrests anyone who mocks it but... every once in a blue moon I think I
can still get one over on flattery.