Math Forum Discussions

Kevin

Posts: 480
Registered: 5/1/10

Re: Surviving The Schizo Gauntlet
Posted: Feb 26, 2013 1:09 PM

Plain Text

On Feb 26, 12:03 pm, Immortalist <reanimater_2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 26, 9:42 am, Kevin <barry196...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I made it through the Marine Corp's Schizo gauntlet... I made it
> > through Academe's Schizo gauntlet... I made it through Psychiatry's
> > Schizo gauntlet... and it must be true that I made it through the
> > Jew's Schizo gauntlet because the safe bet argument boils down to that
> > it must be a 'safe bet' that I'm a 'schizo'...The demented rabbit in
> > Alice in Wonderland has the right idea... (I'm late, I'm late, for a
> > very important date... No time to say hello, ***GOODBYE***) You can't
> > blame me for the 'safe bet' argument. That is what academe believes...
> > Why does my philosophy teacher present the 'safe bet' argument to his
> > class now that we all know what it means? (The 'safe bet' is untenable
> > in a philosophy class unless it is being presented to philosophy
> > majors, methinks... Sartre isn't presented in an introduction to
> > philosophy so why the 'safe bet'?) The Marine Corps doesn't actually
> > make it a high priority to weed out the gun infatuated schizos since a
> > poor judgement call is bad news for the drill instructors. The drill
> > instructors try and break the schizos and the schizos break in front
> > of me instead of the drill instructors. (It couldn't possibly be the
> > case that I have an aptitude for 'transferance issues' since it is
> > impossible for anyone to flatter me for my role in psychiatry given
> > that my expertise in psychiatry is out of dire necessity.) I'm working
> > at a machine shop in Texas and the Texas lead man goes into fits of
> > rage right in front of me and everybody else in the shop... So the
> > Texas lead man is a broken schizo, what happens next? The Texas boss
> > reasons that since the Texas lead man is really that much more
> > important than I am, the Texas boss takes his side over mine. Well, it
> > turns out that 'folding' is objectifiable. Folding is a means for a
> > self attenuating system to make adjustments on itself... in the
> > antimatter realm... so the possible relevance of this to me is that...
> > the math types who do folding are possibly hard nut whackos that I
> > should be leery of. No matter how leery you might happen to be of
> > strings, Marine Corps... a testable strings hypothesis would
> > completely decimate and annihilate quantum physics for all eternity so
> > if you're wondering why I obsess of other intangible aspects of
> > physics, it is because I'm twidling my thumbs while a testable strings
> > hypothesis, which I have no control of, comes to fruition. I can smell
> > obsession at this point because of Klein bottles. Am I the expert?
> > Well, since the rule is for me not to apply myself to anything that is
> > difficult then a banal remark takes precident. Klein bottles intrigue
> > me only once in a blue moon. (How untenable is it that any Jew is on
> > any faculty in American academe? If Jews want to be on a faculty in
> > academe, then what do we have Israel for? How doubly untenable is it
> > that any Jew has tenure on any faculty in American academe? How triply
> > untenable is it that I'm in a partnership with a tenured Jew in
> > American academe?... given that I'm the boss... and the Jew is my
> > subordinate... nevertheless, I'll go along with the charade since I
> > need the cash money at the present moment.)
>
> > The news media is enigmatic in a sense because, the better you are as
> > a scientist, the more obvious it is that you don't care for the
> > limelight... The media is infatuated with it's delusion of being
> > altruistic but it's not true since being under the media gives me
> > what... The government is entitled to control the news media after
> > hostilities have ended between America and another country since how
> > are diplomatic concerns something the news media needs to have control
> > of? Britian is sensitive to militaristic cultures and they always
> > benefit when hostilities have ended between America and another
> > country. America is a diplomatic vassel of the British. Britian is
> > always supportive of American diplomacy and therefore, I think I
> > represent the British sentiment by saying: 'Hilary, it really isn't
> > your fault.' Barak Obama is an obsession of mine due to the fact that
> > he must Lord of the Lunatics if he thinks that confidence and false
> > confidence are the same thing. Barak Obama must have been Nero in a
> > former life. Barak can't exist since my obsession is to have
> > absolutely no knowledge of what is inside of his head.
>
> > Psychiatry claims that they find it difficult to identify which schizo
> > is capable of gun violence but the fact of the matter is that no
> > decent human being cares to involve himself on the topic of
> > transferance issues. It's a real simple rule, psychiatry. Just ask me
> > who the schizos are and I'll point them out to you... and the most
> > obvious schizos of all don't even need my input and that would be
> > anyone who claims that I'm a schizo.
>
> > So I know this guy and I'd estimate his IQ to be around 80... He
> > claims to be clairvoyant... It seems to be a true representation of
> > what he believes to be true so why should I have a problem with it? He
> > is sometimes hostile but does he have just enough on the ball to mock
> > hostility for the sake of making himself an enigma to me? What he
> > seems to really want from me is for me to be proud of him since he
> > believes that he can make someone with an exalted intellect such as
> > mine... think... and I admit that it is true, someone with an IQ of 80
> > can make me think... so what is it that I don't think about? I don't
> > think about the crown that is too heavy for any man to lift... Sounds
> > like a metaphor for pain... Do I want to know what it means and the
> > answer is not at all. The notion that my Aunt Ruth carried the crown
> > that no man can lift is simply a thought that occured to me and I have
> > no intention of pursuing the depth of it's meaning. The issue is a non-
> > sequitor... until the gun obsessed schizo comes along and he
> > apparently wants a chunk of that crown (or maybe he wants the whole
> > damn pie just for the sake of the asking.) The gun obsessed schizo is
> > maybe just a teensy bit smarter than the average bear... but his
> > perspective is that being the boss entitles him to believe that he is
> > the smartest man who ever lived in the history of mankind and so that
> > isn't the thing that he is hiding... The thing that he is hiding is
> > his belief in his own clairvoyance... The consequence of that is that
> > my Aunt Ruth is a source of pain due to the fact that she is hiding
> > the same thing. The gun obsessed schizo cannot make me think under any
> > circumstance whatsoever. The guy with an IQ of 80 can make me think
> > and my Aunt Ruth can make me think but never the gun obsessed schizo.
> > I have a fault given that I am in the habit of believing myself to be
> > indominable. It seems that the Britian's royal family has some odd
> > ways of dealing with pain (given that I should happen to find myself
> > married to the lovely and charming Princess Eugenie.) What would be
> > the big deal of my marrying into the royal family? The question on my
> > mind is: Since we live in a modern 'scientific' age, what benefit does
> > the royal family derive from 'science'? If I'm the 'scientific' choice
> > for marriage into royalty, then I don't see the difficulty. Delusions
> > of grandeur don't exist in psychiatry anymore since flattery readily
> > arrests anyone who mocks it but... every once in a blue moon I think I
> > can still get one over on flattery.
>
> Trying to find the point or the topic of your presentation. Can you
> say it in a sentence or two?
>
> Pie Holehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FWEXRBjZYshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRuLi8geo7Qhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mIMMZQJ1H6E- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yes, the point is that since I'm getting to old for schizo gauntlets,
could you please find the courtesy and the grace to expedite the
remaining gauntlets that I am required to run through... In reality,
the first and only schizo gauntlet I needed to survive was the
Marines. Psychiatry doesn't even think they need to ask or find out if
I was in the Marines before putting me through their schizo
gauntlet... Some pretentious shrink thinks she has some brilliant
thesis that nobody has ever thought of before.