Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
|
|
Space as Faraday's Lines of Force; experiment #1264 New Physics #1384
ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Mar 2, 2013 4:22 AM
|
|
Alright, I had a spell away from physics and am rather revitalized to
do the last 30 pages of NEW PHYSICS textbook. I said I wanted to make
substantial progress on rest-mass, spin, and Space.
So that in the 6th edition, I will not have to pursue what they are,
but pursue working out the bugs and details.
So let me list as brief as possible those concepts and what the
glossary would have them:
Charge: is the geometry of Space, so that -1 electrical charge is
hyperbolic geometry, such as a torus or ring or closed loop wire. +1
charge is elliptic geometry such as a sphere or ellipsoid and 0 charge
is Euclidean flat plane geometry
Rest-mass: this is where the front edge of the wavefront curls around
and becomes a closed loop so that the wave is a standing wave inside
that closed loop. Counting up all the ridges and troughs of the
standing wave is the rest-mass. A photon has 0 rest-mass because the
wavefront never curls around into a closed loop.
Spin: this is merely the superposition of both the Right Hand Rule and
the Left-hand rule. The proton, electron and neutron are all 1/2 spin
because they are the superposition of the Right-hand-rule. The photon
has 0 spin because it is the superposition of two Right-hand-rules.
Two electrons in a suborbital such as 3d6 for iron has superposition
of a one Right hand rule along with one Left hand rule. The unpaired
electrons in iron 3d6 are all aligned and parallel with one Right hand
rule, and it is the magnification of the spins that yields the
permanent bar magnet of iron.
Space: space is the toughest because it draws together all the other
concepts. Space is Faraday's Lines-of-Force as magnetic monopoles of
both M+ and M-. The magnetic monopoles can be either a transverse wave
or a longitudinal wave.
Now to make more progress on Space, I need to focus on the Faraday law
experiment and the superconductivity experiment of the Meissner
effect. What I need is the relationship of permanent magnetism of a
bar magnet and how many electrons the magnet moves in the closed loop
wire. Now how many electrons are moved depends on the speed of
thrusting of the bar magnet. But that is not the focus of my
attention. The focus of my attention is whether magnetism, produced
from spin, is on par or parity with electricity. Does one spinning
electron in a iron magnet cause one electron to flow as a current in
Faraday law? Now if we read Dirac in Directions in Physics, Dirac
claims that a magnetic monopole is
137/2 (e). Dirac implies that magnetism is far more powerful than is
electricity. Now, keep in mind in the experiment we need to get rid of
the factor of the "speed of thrust" to make electrons move. So that
ideally, if we had one iron atom with its 4 unpaired electrons as a
permanent bar magnet and a closed loop wire in Faraday's law, would
that iron atom cause 4 electrons to move or cause 137/2 x 4 electrons
to move?
To answer that question, I need to bring in the Meissner effect in
superconductivity.
--
Google's (and Bing's) searches and archives are top-heavy in hate-
spew from search-engine-bombing. And the Google archive stopped
functioning properly by the end of May 2012. And recently Niuz.biz
(Docendi.org) threatens to harm your computer if opening a post of
mine.
The solution to the sci. newsgroups is to have the sciences hosted by
colleges and universities such as Drexel University, not by
corporations like Google out to make money. Science belongs in
education, not in money grubbing companies.
Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair
archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
|
|
|
|
