Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.
|
|
Kevin
Posts:
479
Registered:
5/1/10
|
|
Double Torroids, Aerospace, and Fermilab
Posted:
Mar 4, 2013 3:29 PM
|
|
What seems to make Aerospace and Fermilab content is to take double
torroids and split them left and right... and then flip one of the
halves 180 degrees... and so is this the trapping of an electron? or
the new trapping of an electron? The previous to this seemed to
suggest that double torroids and flying saucers have a strong cross
referance.
The reason that the four player game is my vehicle and not vice versa
is because I am argumentative death to lesbians in academe... OTOH, I
am not argumentative about quarks. I have an aptitude for doing
wormholes by myself and whenever I have a partner, my partner's
wormholes get flattened. I don't have an aptitude for doing monopoles
since every monopole gets flattened. Monopoles are about splitting the
equation. Georgia Tech Aerospace's monopoles got flattened... That is
why only Aerospace Engineering can flip left and right 180 degrees on
a half hemisphere. Muon's are curious to me given nanotechnology... It
is gratifying to know that the muon folk have managed to gain some
satisfaction by being persistant. They have proven a smaller proton...
Does this cycle back to Oort? If so, then it plies in my favor. Oort
plies in my favor because I don't need Oort... Oort is insane so why
is he relevant? Oort is relevant to the milquetoast set. He is
irrelevant to me but relevant to the milquetoast set.
|
|
|
|
