Here is an excellent question to ask your local physics or astronomy professor who accepts the Newton force of gravity or the General Relativity gravity. Ask him/her, how is it that the Solar System has a Plane of Ecliptic and that most galaxies-- 66% have similar plane of ecliptic as seen in spiral galaxies? Ask them because in both Newtonian gravity and General Relativity, planes should not be the endproduct, but rather, revolutions of objects around a central mass should be in all 360 degrees directions, not coalesced into one single plane.
Now they would be very much stuck and blushing in shame, because their vaunted Newtonian gravity or General Relativity is deaf dumb and silent as to why the endproduct of gravity is a plane of ecliptic. The Maxwell Equations as the axiom set over all of physics has a easy time and answer for this question. Simply look at the Faraday law which says that given a central core mass, and where gravity is the magnetic monopoles of mass of attraction force only, that the Faraday law says that stars will flow as a current in a closed loop wire, a ecliptic- plane and that the Sun as the central mass, that the planets according to Faraday's law forces the planes to revolve around the Sun as if they were current in a closed loop wire (plane of ecliptic).
So with the Maxwell Equations as axioms, we simply solve what gravity is, we unify gravity with EM and we deduce why plane of ecliptic is so important to astronomical bodies, be they solar systems or galaxies. The Maxwell Equations endpoint of evolution of shapes of bodies is revolution around a plane of ecliptic.
Alright, when I reach page 1300 with the end of New Physics text, then I jump over into the Atom Totality text exclusively. And I start that with these three chapters leading off:
Chapt16.1 Ring in galactic mapping in 3rd layer of Caltech's mapping suggests the electron lobe of a Plutonium Atom Totality
Chapt16.12 Limits of distance that light can travel and be seen; Experiment ; recent asteroid and meteor encounter
Chapt16.13 Galactic shapes and evolution when Maxwell Equations are axioms over all of Physics
Now I need to develop this plane of ecliptic more so in details. But the astronomy literature is very poor on data and facts that I need. For example, I need an accurate percentages of spiral, versus elliptical, versus irregular shaped galaxies. From what I have been able to find out is that spiral galaxies comprise about 66% of the galaxies observed and that ellipticals comprise about 20% and irregulars the remainder.
Now the shapes of the galaxies would further support the idea that gravity is the EM force of magnetic monopoles and the Faraday law of motion. That we have solid-body-rotation among barred spiral galaxies. And where we have a sort of conundrum about ellipticals for they seem to not follow a Faraday law and form a plane of ecliptic. Maybe they are young galaxies would answer it. And if young, then maybe many of the stars are not spin-aligned well enough with other stars. In a barred spiral galaxy the spins of the stars are very much all aligned in one direction. Now has anyone checked for spin in the ice particles of Saturn's Ring, for if each particle has a spin and if all of them are pretty much aligned, would enhance their solid body rotation.
As for Irregular galaxies, that is easy to explain and demonstrate in a physics experiment where we have two separate galaxies with their planes of ecliptic that collide and where the EM-gravity then violently flings the contents of both galaxies into a chaotic orbits. Picture a bar magnet and iron filings on sheet of paper and along comes a new bar magnet across the sheet of paper flinging those iron fillings into a chaotic new pattern.
Google's (and Bing's) searches and archives are top-heavy in hate-spew generated by search-engine-bombing. And the Google archive stopped functioning properly by about May 2012 to accomodate Google's New- Newsgroups. And recently Niuz.biz (Docendi.org) threatens to harm your computer if opening a post of mine.
The solution to the sci. newsgroups is to have the sciences hosted by colleges and universities such as Drexel University doing sci.math, not by corporations like Google out to make money. Science belongs in education, not in money motivated corporations. Do I hear a?University doing sci.physics? sci.chem? sci.biology? sci.geology? etc ?etc
Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here: