Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum
»
Discussions
»
sci.math.*
»
sci.math
Topic:
easiest disproof of Newtonian and General Relativity gravity; no Linear Momentum in Maxwell Equations #1278 New Physics #1398 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Replies:
1
Last Post:
Mar 14, 2013 10:03 PM




easiest disproof of Newtonian and General Relativity gravity; no Linear Momentum in Maxwell Equations #1278 New Physics #1398 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Mar 7, 2013 12:32 PM


Easiest way for Cassini to prove solid body rotation on Saturn Rings; why the Cosmos has no Linear Momentum
Last night I left off with a comment that CassiniHuygens probe is still near Saturn and active until 2017. So I wanted to know of the easiest measurement to prove that the Rings of Saturn are Solid Body Rotation. Come to think about it last night, the easiest proof would be to find faster speeds in outlying rings than in rings closer to the planet. Another way to prove solid body rotation is to find a structure that cuts across rings and remains intact during rotations.
But this morning I seized hold of an entirely new and breathetaking other solution. If the entirety of physics is governed by the Maxwell Equations, then in such a system, there is no Linear Momentum.
That would mean, all rotations if looked upon far enough in Space would be Solid Body Rotations. If the Maxwell Equations are the axioms of physics, then there is Angular Momentum but no linearmomentum because the 4 Maxwell Equations all loop around.
So now, let us look again at the Newtonian gravity and the General Relativity and the Solar System. In both Newtonian gravity and General Relativity, we require there to be Linear Momentum, because in Newtonian gravity, an object would just go straight in Space unless acted upon by the force of gravity. In General Relativity, mass bends space and other matter follows the curvature of that space, otherwise without mass present, matter goes in linear momentum a straight line.
Now let us think of Maxwell Equations and gravity as EMgravity. Here we have no linear momentum but rather angular momentum because all linesofforce which makes up Space curves back around upon itself, as in both Gauss's laws of electricity and magnetism.
So, here is the proof that I need to show Newtonian gravity is fakery and that General Relativity is fakery.
Sun ?____ ?Speed in Space 220 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 7,000 km/hour Mercury ?____ ?Orbital speed 47 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 10 km/hour Venus ?____ ?Orbital speed 35 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 6 km/hour Earth ?____ ?Orbital speed 29 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 1,674 km/hour Mars ?____ ?Orbital speed 24 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 868 km/hour Jupiter ?____ ?Orbital speed 13 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 45,300 km/hour Saturn ?____ ?Orbital speed 9 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 35,500 km/hour Uranus ?____ ?Orbital speed 6 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 9,320 km/hour Neptune ?____ ?Orbital speed 5 km/sec ?Equatorial Rotation velocity 9,660 km/hour If the Sun had a 0 speed through Space instead of its 220 km/sec whereas the planets speed through space is between 47 and 5 km/sec, then both Newtonian gravity and General Relativity could be true. But, because the speed of the Sun (linear momentum) is so enormous over the speed of planets circling the Sun (their linear momentum) would make it impossible for those planets to revolve around the Sun.
Likewise for the Rings of Saturn, because the planet Saturn is not stationary but moving in Space would not allow for a Newtonian nor General Relativity gravity to have that structure, call it SolidBody Motion.
The planets around the Sun is SolidBodyMotion and the Rings of Saturn is SolidBodyMotion around Saturn.
So, I do not need any other proof that Newtonian gravity and General Relativity are fake theories. All I need to show is that we have permanent structures of rotation or revolution around a central structure which is moving in Space.
The only force in physics that can accommodate such a permanent structure and still be moving itself is the Faraday Law of Maxwell Equations.
In the Maxwell Equations, there is no Linear Momentum, all is angular momentum. So that in General Relativity of Old Physics, Space is already bent, and we need no mass to bend space.
In New Physics, because the Maxwell Equations are the axioms over all of physics, the reason that the planets stay together in the plane of Ecliptic even though the Sun is moving at a speed of 220 km/sec while the planets are moving at a paltry 47 to 5 km/second is because there is no linear momentum in the Maxwell Equations.

Google's (and Bing's) searches and archives are topheavy in hatespew generated by searchenginebombing. And the Google archive stopped functioning properly by about May 2012 to accomodate Google's?New Newsgroups. And recently Niuz.biz (Docendi.org) threatens to harm your computer if opening a post of mine.
The solution to the sci. newsgroups is to have the sciences hosted by colleges and universities such as Drexel University doing sci.math, not by corporations like Google out to make money. Science belongs in education, not in money motivated corporations. Do I hear a?University doing sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.biology, sci.geology, etc etc
Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies



