Drexel dragonThe Math ForumDonate to the Math Forum



Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by Drexel University or The Math Forum.


Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math.independent

Topic: Matheology § 223: AC and AMS
Replies: 6   Last Post: Mar 14, 2013 6:32 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Scott Berg

Posts: 1,694
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Matheology � 223: AC and AMS
Posted: Mar 14, 2013 3:09 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply


"WM" <mueckenh@rz.fh-augsburg.de> wrote in message
news:343afda7-f124-4fb2-9711-dde62a940638@fn10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
On 14 Mrz., 16:22, Alan Smaill <sma...@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
> WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de> writes:
> > On 14 Mrz., 13:59, Alan Smaill <sma...@SPAMinf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
>


>
>> This is not a consequence from the axiom;

>This is a consequence of the axiom as Zermelo stated it when he was
>not yet aware that this axiom is in contradiction with the theorem
>that uncountably many elements exist in some sets.


wrong, An axiom is a premise or starting point of reasoning, theorems
follow.

no wonder you all mixed up !


>Regards, WM





Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© Drexel University 1994-2014. All Rights Reserved.
The Math Forum is a research and educational enterprise of the Drexel University School of Education.