The Math Forum

Search All of the Math Forum:

Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by NCTM or The Math Forum.

Math Forum » Discussions » sci.math.* » sci.math

Notice: We are no longer accepting new posts, but the forums will continue to be readable.

Topic: Matheology § 223: AC and AMS
Replies: 6   Last Post: Mar 14, 2013 6:32 PM

Advanced Search

Back to Topic List Back to Topic List Jump to Tree View Jump to Tree View   Messages: [ Previous | Next ]
Scott Berg

Posts: 2,111
Registered: 12/12/04
Re: Matheology � 223: AC and AMS
Posted: Mar 14, 2013 3:09 PM
  Click to see the message monospaced in plain text Plain Text   Click to reply to this topic Reply

"WM" <> wrote in message
On 14 Mrz., 16:22, Alan Smaill <> wrote:
> WM <> writes:
> > On 14 Mrz., 13:59, Alan Smaill <> wrote:

>> This is not a consequence from the axiom;

>This is a consequence of the axiom as Zermelo stated it when he was
>not yet aware that this axiom is in contradiction with the theorem
>that uncountably many elements exist in some sets.

wrong, An axiom is a premise or starting point of reasoning, theorems

no wonder you all mixed up !

>Regards, WM

Point your RSS reader here for a feed of the latest messages in this topic.

[Privacy Policy] [Terms of Use]

© The Math Forum at NCTM 1994-2018. All Rights Reserved.