On 3/22/2013 4:09 AM, WM wrote: > On 22 Mrz., 09:14, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >> On 3/22/2013 1:55 AM, WM wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 21 Mrz., 20:35, fom <fomJ...@nyms.net> wrote: >>>> On 3/21/2013 10:11 AM, WM wrote: >> >>>>> Induction does not need time. >> >>>> In >> >>>> news://news.giganews.com:119/f23c81fd-2463-4d3f-8df4-04799a493...@z4g2000vbz.googlegroups.com >> >>>> WM wrote: >> >>>> ================ >>>> Everything that is in the list >>>> 1 >>>> 1, 2 >>>> 1, 2, 3 >>>> ... >>>> 1, 2, 3, ..., n >>>> is in the last line. Alas as soon as you try to fix it, it is no >>>> longer the last line. >> >>> The former is the position of set theory, the latter is the correct >>> way of thinking - useful for those who can think. >> >> If you believe that to be the case, >> why will you not explain the details? > > Because every intelligent reader has already got it. >
