Search All of the Math Forum:
Views expressed in these public forums are not endorsed by
Drexel University or The Math Forum.



concepts Glossary #1299 New Physics #1419 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed
Posted:
Mar 18, 2013 12:59 AM


Alright, 2 more posts and the end of New Physics for the 5th edition. It has been highly productive, and one of the most productive periods of my life, where I wrangled together all of physics under one axiom set. Do not ever believe others who say that a scientist best productive years are before he/she reaches 30, for they do not know what they are talking about. The most productive years of a scientist can often be when they reach old age from 40 to 63. I think Euler, Maxwell, Dirac, Galileo were smartest and most productive after 40. Unfortunately, many of the best scientists played around too much with toxic chemicals such as mercury, such as Newton and Faraday. But if you are a exceptional scientist, your peek prime can often be from 40 to 63, provided of course, your living conditions and social affairs give you the time to devote to science. Many scientists are waylaid due to social circumstances that fills their time and thoughts with nonscience activities. One of the reasons I never married, was that I instinctively knew it would drag me away from science, never to devote myself. So when they say, if nothing by age 30, then your spent, is pure malarkey. If you love science and want to accomplish new science, then you have to prepare in High School your road to that eventual success, and never stray off that road too much. You can take a few detours, but not too many.
But now, these last 2 pages of New Physics. I want to prepare myself in memory for the 6th edition by reading the last 10 pages to remind myself of how to organize and where I last left off in ideas. A glossary of concepts and terms is good practice for organizing and memory.
Now I need to include big and great experiments of New Physics in the glossary. The experiment that comes to mind most readily is the Faraday Law Parity Experiment which seeks to find out if a electron aligned in spin causes a single, one and only one electron in the closed loop wire to move as current. So we want to know if magnetism is equal to electricity in the Faraday law. And this also relates to Dirac's estimate that a magnetic monopole is 137/2(e) which would say the Parity Experiment is not 1 to 1 but rather would be 1 to 137/2. Personally I think Dirac made a mistake here and that it is really 1 to 1.
(17) Faraday Law Parity Experiment: ?What is attempted is to answer the question of how much of a magnetic ?field creates a electric current flow in the closed loop wire. We know ?that a permanent bar magnet has N number of electrons of aligned spin ?in order to create the permanent bar magnet. So the question is, is ?every single electron of spin aligned in the magnet cause a single ?electron in the closed loop wire to move as a current. ?Another way of asking the question, is whether 10^10 single electrons ?of the magnet of aligned spin cause exactly the same number of ?electrons in the closed loop wire to move as a current flow 10^10. Now the difficult part of the experiment is to remove the arbitrary motion of the thrusting of the magnet into the closed loop. If the magnet motion is fast, then the current is fast and large than if the motion were slow. I am not questioning the speed of thrust of magnet. I am wanting to know of the numbers correlation between electron spins ?in the magnet as linked to how many electrons move in the closed loop ?wire. Is it a parity? If there are 6*10^23 aligned electrons of spin ?in the magnet that cause exactly and only exactly 6*10^23 electrons in ?the closed loop wire to move as a current, then we have Parity. And if that is true, then we still have the Ampere/Maxwell law and we would have that 6*10^23 electrons in the current create a magnetic field of 6*10^23 linesofmagneticforce, yet there is still the unaccounted Displacement Current. So if this experiment is conducted and essentially the above facts are ?arrived at, then the Displacement Current in the Maxwell Equations is ?a proof that Conservation Laws of Physics have no upper limit, but ?that mass and energy is freely and newly created.
(18) Fusion Barrier Principle:
What the Fusion Barrier Principle, FBP, is A good definition of the Fusion Barrier Principle, FBP is: Fission energy is the highest form of energy that is able to be controlled and surpass breakeven. A Tokamak such as JET or ITER can only reach 2/3 breakeven because 1/3 of the input energy is forever lost in controlling the device.
How is it derived from the Maxwell Equations as axioms? Well it is rather simple and easy for if you consider Faraday law as cylinder and Gauss's law of electricity as a sphere, that Faraday law is 1/3 more surface area than the sphere of Gauss's law. So to control a machine without blowing it apart in an explosion, you have to input 1/3 more energy to control the machine than ever the 2/3 energy coming out in output.
(19) Standard Model of Physics: well, it is a fakery but let me highlight its horrible features. It is purely just mathematical of a algebra. It never made any predictions but always waited for the experiments to come in with data and then it claimed to have made "postdictions" not predictions. Such as the recent disaster of Higgs boson where some are now claiming 6 Higgs boson because the particle never met the criteria of prediction. When physics is run by persons who love a mathematical scheme and try to straightjacket physics to that mathematical scheme, they usually end up in the trash heap of science history. The last time I remember a mathematical algebra running physics was the Ptolemy epicycles where the motion of all the planets and their moons had to be "perfect circles" and since none of them were perfect circles but rather ellipses in motion, more and more epicycles had to be dreamed up. Just like the Higgs boson nonsense where they now are dreaming up 6 Higgs bosons.
The smart, the intelligent physicist, instead of running to pure math and their algebras to straightjacket physics with, why not just take the Maxwell Equations, the 4 Symmetrical Maxwell Equations and present them as the axioms over all of physics and see what miraculous unifications and predictions those 4 equations deliver.
Now Maxwell died at a relatively young age of 48 from stomach cancer. I wonder if any modern day medicine autopsy can be taken as to why stomach cancer? But if Maxwell had lived to be in his 60s, I am confident the idea would have entered his mind that the Maxwell Equations could be the axiom set over all of physics. Maxwell was a good mathematician as well as a physicist, so I wonder if he ever hinted the idea of his equations being a axiom set.

Google's (and Bing's) searches and archives are topheavy in hatespew generated by searchenginebombing. And the Google archive stopped functioning properly by about May 2012 to accommodate Google's New Newsgroups. And recently Niuz.biz (Docendi.org) threatens to harm?your computer if opening a post of mine.
The solution to the sci. newsgroups is to have the sciences hosted by colleges and universities such as Drexel University hosting sci.math, not by corporations like Google out to make money. Science belongs in education, not in money motivated corporations. Do I hear a University ?doing sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.biology, sci.geology, etc ?etc
Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent, simple and fair archiving of AP posts for the past 15 years as seen here:
http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986
Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electrondotcloud are galaxies



